Using AI to adapt reading input for mixed-proficiency EFL learners

Mixed-proficiency EFL classrooms complicate the provision of level-appropriate reading input. This study examined whether AI-based text adaptation improves reading comprehension for learners at different proficiency levels. Grounded in Krashen's Input Hypothesis and Cognitive Load Theory, the study used a 2 × 2 mixed factorial design (text version: original vs. AI-adapted; proficiency: Intermediate-Low vs. Advanced-Low) to test performance on inference-making and reading-for-specific-information tasks. Forty-eight university EFL students, classified using ACTFL guidelines, completed comprehension tasks using original and AI-adapted versions of the same source texts, with text-version order counterbalanced using two parallel test forms to reduce order effects. Intermediate-Low learners scored significantly higher on adapted than on original texts ( p < .001), whereas Advanced-Low learners showed comparable performance across versions. A significant text-by-proficiency interaction ( p < .001) suggests that AI-assisted adaptation can support differentiated reading instruction by improving access to comprehensible input for lower-proficiency learners without disadvantaging higher-proficiency learners, while providing a transparent workflow for proficiency-aligned adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1737903
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using AI to adapt reading input for mixed-proficiency EFL learners

Mutasim Al‐Deaibes, Hesham Aldamen, Rami Alsharefeen, Areen Alnemrat
Frontiers in Education
Text Readability and Simplification
article

Using AI to adapt reading input for mixed-proficiency EFL learners

Mutasim Al‐Deaibes, Hesham Aldamen, Rami Alsharefeen, Areen Alnemrat
article en

Abstract

Mixed-proficiency EFL classrooms complicate the provision of level-appropriate reading input. This study examined whether AI-based text adaptation improves reading comprehension for learners at different proficiency levels. Grounded in Krashen's Input Hypothesis and Cognitive Load Theory, the study used a 2 × 2 mixed factorial design (text version: original vs. AI-adapted; proficiency: Intermediate-Low vs. Advanced-Low) to test performance on inference-making and reading-for-specific-information tasks. Forty-eight university EFL students, classified using ACTFL guidelines, completed comprehension tasks using original and AI-adapted versions of the same source texts, with text-version order counterbalanced using two parallel test forms to reduce order effects. Intermediate-Low learners scored significantly higher on adapted than on original texts ( p < .001), whereas Advanced-Low learners showed comparable performance across versions. A significant text-by-proficiency interaction ( p < .001) suggests that AI-assisted adaptation can support differentiated reading instruction by improving access to comprehensible input for lower-proficiency learners without disadvantaging higher-proficiency learners, while providing a transparent workflow for proficiency-aligned adaptation.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
University of Jordan (JO), American University of Sharjah (AE), Academy of Public Administration (AZ), Yarmouk University (JO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Text Readability and Simplification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.