A pathway to sustainable development in the GCC: Empirical evidence on how renewable energy and structural change mitigate natural capital's environmental effects

The GCC region has long relied on its abundant natural capital for development, but this dependence has driven significant CO 2 emissions at a high environmental cost. In response, GCC countries are actively diversifying their economies by shifting from oil and gas dependence toward renewable energy and service sector growth. Using panel data and the PMG-ARDL approach for GCC countries (2003–2021), this study examines the long- and short-run impacts of GDP, natural capital, renewable energy, non-renewable energy, structural change, and urban population on CO 2 emissions, specifically testing whether renewable energy and structural change can mitigate the detrimental effects of natural capital. FMOLS and DOLS methods test the robustness of long-run results. Our findings reveal that in the long run, GDP, non-renewable energy, natural capital, and urban population increase emissions, while renewable energy and structural change reduce them. A 1% increase in renewable energy reduces CO 2 emissions by 2.25% and a 1% increase in structural change reduces them by 0.168%, whereas a 1% increase in natural capital raises emissions by 0.28%. Moreover, renewable energy reduces natural capital's emissions intensity by 0.61% and structural change reduces it by 0.04%, confirming that both factors successfully mitigate the positive effect of natural capital on emissions. We conclude that accelerating the transition towards a diversified green economy is not merely an economic imperative for the GCC but an environmental necessity. These findings offer a clear policy pathway, underscoring the dual benefits of renewable energy investment and structural reform for achieving sustainable development in the region. • In GCC, GDP, natural capital, and non-renewable energy raise CO2 emissions. • Renewable energy and structural change reduce CO2 emissions. • Renewable energy and structural change reduce emissions from natural capital • The long-term PMG-ARDL results are robust to FMOLS and DOLS estimators. • GCC policies must pivot to promoting structural change and renewable energy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2026.101273
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A pathway to sustainable development in the GCC: Empirical evidence on how renewable energy and structural change mitigate natural capital's environmental effects

Kahouli Zohra, Hamrouni Daghbagi, DRIDI Dhouha
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

A pathway to sustainable development in the GCC: Empirical evidence on how renewable energy and structural change mitigate natural capital's environmental effects

Kahouli Zohra, Hamrouni Daghbagi, DRIDI Dhouha
article en

Abstract

The GCC region has long relied on its abundant natural capital for development, but this dependence has driven significant CO 2 emissions at a high environmental cost. In response, GCC countries are actively diversifying their economies by shifting from oil and gas dependence toward renewable energy and service sector growth. Using panel data and the PMG-ARDL approach for GCC countries (2003–2021), this study examines the long- and short-run impacts of GDP, natural capital, renewable energy, non-renewable energy, structural change, and urban population on CO 2 emissions, specifically testing whether renewable energy and structural change can mitigate the detrimental effects of natural capital. FMOLS and DOLS methods test the robustness of long-run results. Our findings reveal that in the long run, GDP, non-renewable energy, natural capital, and urban population increase emissions, while renewable energy and structural change reduce them. A 1% increase in renewable energy reduces CO 2 emissions by 2.25% and a 1% increase in structural change reduces them by 0.168%, whereas a 1% increase in natural capital raises emissions by 0.28%. Moreover, renewable energy reduces natural capital's emissions intensity by 0.61% and structural change reduces it by 0.04%, confirming that both factors successfully mitigate the positive effect of natural capital on emissions. We conclude that accelerating the transition towards a diversified green economy is not merely an economic imperative for the GCC but an environmental necessity. These findings offer a clear policy pathway, underscoring the dual benefits of renewable energy investment and structural reform for achieving sustainable development in the region. • In GCC, GDP, natural capital, and non-renewable energy raise CO2 emissions. • Renewable energy and structural change reduce CO2 emissions. • Renewable energy and structural change reduce emissions from natural capital • The long-term PMG-ARDL results are robust to FMOLS and DOLS estimators. • GCC policies must pivot to promoting structural change and renewable energy.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 30
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Dar Al Uloom University (SA), Manouba University (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.