Shifting the Power Balance in the EU's Single Market? Central and Eastern European Agents of Change

Abstract This Symposium analyses how European Union (EU) member states have adjusted domestic policies in response to the evolving governance of the single market since the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent EU shocks. Confronted with new opportunities and constraints, countries have adopted diverse forms of domestic agency that have, in turn, reshaped the de facto governance of the single market. We focus on Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), where such forms of agency have been novel and unexpected, given the region's high transnational dependency and their traditional position as passive EU rule‐takers. We show that CEE states have engaged creatively with EU‐level changes, often mobilising actors beyond central governments to tackle domestic economic challenges. This editorial introduction traces the evolving interdependence between CEE agency and the EU's institutional regime, whilst the four empirical contributions examine how CEE countries have leveraged new EU incentives and limitations in practice, with a focus on the manufacturing and finance sectors. Our findings reveal a critical tension: the EU's governance shifts since 2008 have produced a hybrid regulatory framework that combines tighter supranational constraints in some domains with expanded scope for adaptive and experimental domestic agency in others. CEE states have leveraged this uneven regulatory space in creative ways, but outcomes in terms of economic upgrading and convergence remain mixed and uncertain. We conclude that this hybrid governance framework risks entrenching fragmentation within the single market and reinforcing the socio‐economic challenges of the EU's Eastern periphery. By questioning assumptions of minimal CEE agency in managing transnational dependencies and by identifying the specific forms of domestic agency that have emerged in the region since 2008, the Symposium underscores the need to balance national experimentation with strategic economic cohesion and co‐ordination at the EU level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70118
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
54.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shifting the Power Balance in the EU's Single Market? Central and Eastern European Agents of Change

Dorothee Böhle, Jasper P. Simons, Sonja Avlijaš, GergŐ Medve‐Bálint
1 citations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
54.63
article

Shifting the Power Balance in the EU's Single Market? Central and Eastern European Agents of Change

Dorothee Böhle, Jasper P. Simons, Sonja Avlijaš, GergŐ Medve‐Bálint
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This Symposium analyses how European Union (EU) member states have adjusted domestic policies in response to the evolving governance of the single market since the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent EU shocks. Confronted with new opportunities and constraints, countries have adopted diverse forms of domestic agency that have, in turn, reshaped the de facto governance of the single market. We focus on Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), where such forms of agency have been novel and unexpected, given the region's high transnational dependency and their traditional position as passive EU rule‐takers. We show that CEE states have engaged creatively with EU‐level changes, often mobilising actors beyond central governments to tackle domestic economic challenges. This editorial introduction traces the evolving interdependence between CEE agency and the EU's institutional regime, whilst the four empirical contributions examine how CEE countries have leveraged new EU incentives and limitations in practice, with a focus on the manufacturing and finance sectors. Our findings reveal a critical tension: the EU's governance shifts since 2008 have produced a hybrid regulatory framework that combines tighter supranational constraints in some domains with expanded scope for adaptive and experimental domestic agency in others. CEE states have leveraged this uneven regulatory space in creative ways, but outcomes in terms of economic upgrading and convergence remain mixed and uncertain. We conclude that this hybrid governance framework risks entrenching fragmentation within the single market and reinforcing the socio‐economic challenges of the EU's Eastern periphery. By questioning assumptions of minimal CEE agency in managing transnational dependencies and by identifying the specific forms of domestic agency that have emerged in the region since 2008, the Symposium underscores the need to balance national experimentation with strategic economic cohesion and co‐ordination at the EU level.

JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), University of Vienna (AT), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), University of Belgrade (RS), Centre for Social Sciences (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
European Union Policy and Governance
54.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.