AI Authorship and the Role of the Librarian <b></b>

Debates about generative artificial intelligence (AI) authorship have intensified within higher education and among academic publishers, with divisive opinions about responsible collaboration versus prohibition of AI use. Within the field of library and information science, these debates are especially complex due to the field’s highly interdisciplinary nature, which brings together contributors from the humanities, social and natural sciences, and dual commitments to professional practice and technical innovation. This essay examines the tensions surrounding AI-assisted writing and argues for the need to move beyond the simplistic accept-prohibit dichotomy. Drawing on the previously introduced concept of “bothorship,” the paper proposes a model of responsible AI authorship that preserves human intellectual ownership while acknowledging the practical and equity-related benefits of AI-supported writing. Attention is given to the role of libraries and librarians – including theological libraries – in advancing AI literacy, supporting ethical writing practices, and mitigating structural inequities in scholarly communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theological Librarianship
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31046/7a5ddy84
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Authorship and the Role of the Librarian

Brady Lund
Theological Librarianship
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI Authorship and the Role of the Librarian

Brady Lund
article en

Abstract

Debates about generative artificial intelligence (AI) authorship have intensified within higher education and among academic publishers, with divisive opinions about responsible collaboration versus prohibition of AI use. Within the field of library and information science, these debates are especially complex due to the field’s highly interdisciplinary nature, which brings together contributors from the humanities, social and natural sciences, and dual commitments to professional practice and technical innovation. This essay examines the tensions surrounding AI-assisted writing and argues for the need to move beyond the simplistic accept-prohibit dichotomy. Drawing on the previously introduced concept of “bothorship,” the paper proposes a model of responsible AI authorship that preserves human intellectual ownership while acknowledging the practical and equity-related benefits of AI-supported writing. Attention is given to the role of libraries and librarians – including theological libraries – in advancing AI literacy, supporting ethical writing practices, and mitigating structural inequities in scholarly communication.

Theological LibrarianshipVol. 19(1)
University of North Texas (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.