Women’s preferences for cervical cancer screening methods: a discrete choice experiment in Estonia and France

This study explores women’s preferences for cervical cancer screening (CCS) in Estonia and France, particularly preferences for self-sampling (SS). Although many European countries have introduced organized CCS, screening behaviours still exhibit a strong social gradient, with CC disproportionately affecting populations facing barriers to access, such as low income, rural residence, migration status or low education. The WHO has set a goal of eliminating CC and has proposed different strategies of invitations, outreach campaigns and the introduction of SS as a potential lever to increase uptake. To assess whether these CCS strategies align with women’s preferences, we conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Estonia and France. Pooling our data (N = 4774), we used a two-stage decision-making framework; first, intervention preferences were assessed, and then the willingness to participate if preferred interventions were implemented was measured. We also conducted a heterogeneity analysis via latent class analysis. The DCE has three attributes: invitation methods, sampling methods (physician-based sampling or self-sampling), and awareness-raising campaigns. The results were analysed using a mixed multinomial logit model to capture heterogeneity in preferences and explore factors influencing CCS participation. The results show that the implementation of SS would: 1) increase uptake among women facing geographical barriers to CCS, 2) help engage first-time screeners in a screening pathway and 3) possibly deter participation from women already engaged in their screening pathway if implemented as sole mean of screening. Our results thus advocate for tailored screening programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04478-z
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women’s preferences for cervical cancer screening methods: a discrete choice experiment in Estonia and France

Carine Franc, Anneli Uusküla, Lise Rochaix, Violette Delisle et al.
BMC Women s Health
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Women’s preferences for cervical cancer screening methods: a discrete choice experiment in Estonia and France

Carine Franc, Anneli Uusküla, Lise Rochaix, Violette Delisle, Anna Tisler, Marc Bardou
article en

Abstract

This study explores women’s preferences for cervical cancer screening (CCS) in Estonia and France, particularly preferences for self-sampling (SS). Although many European countries have introduced organized CCS, screening behaviours still exhibit a strong social gradient, with CC disproportionately affecting populations facing barriers to access, such as low income, rural residence, migration status or low education. The WHO has set a goal of eliminating CC and has proposed different strategies of invitations, outreach campaigns and the introduction of SS as a potential lever to increase uptake. To assess whether these CCS strategies align with women’s preferences, we conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Estonia and France. Pooling our data (N = 4774), we used a two-stage decision-making framework; first, intervention preferences were assessed, and then the willingness to participate if preferred interventions were implemented was measured. We also conducted a heterogeneity analysis via latent class analysis. The DCE has three attributes: invitation methods, sampling methods (physician-based sampling or self-sampling), and awareness-raising campaigns. The results were analysed using a mixed multinomial logit model to capture heterogeneity in preferences and explore factors influencing CCS participation. The results show that the implementation of SS would: 1) increase uptake among women facing geographical barriers to CCS, 2) help engage first-time screeners in a screening pathway and 3) possibly deter participation from women already engaged in their screening pathway if implemented as sole mean of screening. Our results thus advocate for tailored screening programs.

BMC Women s Health
Inserm (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (FR), CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), University of Tartu (EE), Paris School of Economics (FR)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.