A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Impact of Sternal Fractures on Outcomes in Concurrent Thoracic Spine Fractures: The Fourth Column of the Spine

BACKGROUND: The thoracic vertebrae, ribs, and sternum, provide structural and protective support for the upper body. The unique framework of the region suggests that fractures involving both the thoracic spine and sternum occur with notable spinal instability. Despite their clinical relevance, the short-term medical and surgical outcomes of combined sternal and thoracic spinal fractures remain poorly understood compared with thoracic fractures alone. This study aims to compare the 90-day complication rates and surgical intervention requirements in patients with concomitant sternal and thoracic vertebral fractures with those with isolated thoracic vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients presenting with acute sternal and thoracic spine fractures in the same admission were identified using the PearlDiver database. Patients with sternal and vertebral fractures were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio with a control group by age and Elixhauser comorbidity index. Medical complications, rate of spinal cord injury, and rates of surgical intervention were assessed at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 9,026 patients were identified in this study with 4,513 patients presenting with sternal and thoracic spine fractures and 4,513 patients in the control group. Sternal and vertebral fracture coinjury was associated with higher rates of spinal cord injury (P < 0.0001), higher rates for spinal decompression/fusion (odds ratio = 4.38, P < 0.0001), and higher rates of thoracic surgery (odds ratio = 3.0, P < 0.0001). These patients were also statistically markedly more likely to develop hemodynamic, respiratory, cardiac, and renal complications (P < 0.001) at 90 days. DISCUSSION: Patients with thoracic spine fractures who sustain simultaneous sternal fractures are markedly more likely to have concomitant spinal cord injury, require spinal stabilization or decompression, and develop medical complications. Our findings point toward the role of the sternum as a fourth column of stability in cases of thoracic spinal fractures, which mitigate complications, surgery, and neurologic injury in cases of trauma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-25-01430
Primary Topic
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Impact of Sternal Fractures on Outcomes in Concurrent Thoracic Spine Fractures: The Fourth Column of the Spine

Austin H. Carroll, Yin Ruijie, Alejandro Quinonez, Addisu Mesfin et al.
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
article

A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Impact of Sternal Fractures on Outcomes in Concurrent Thoracic Spine Fractures: The Fourth Column of the Spine

Austin H. Carroll, Yin Ruijie, Alejandro Quinonez, Addisu Mesfin, J Japa, Christopher P. Bellaire, Mark Ehioghae, Lancelot Benn, Kevin Yoon, Daniel Griffin, Alejandro Perez-Albela
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The thoracic vertebrae, ribs, and sternum, provide structural and protective support for the upper body. The unique framework of the region suggests that fractures involving both the thoracic spine and sternum occur with notable spinal instability. Despite their clinical relevance, the short-term medical and surgical outcomes of combined sternal and thoracic spinal fractures remain poorly understood compared with thoracic fractures alone. This study aims to compare the 90-day complication rates and surgical intervention requirements in patients with concomitant sternal and thoracic vertebral fractures with those with isolated thoracic vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients presenting with acute sternal and thoracic spine fractures in the same admission were identified using the PearlDiver database. Patients with sternal and vertebral fractures were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio with a control group by age and Elixhauser comorbidity index. Medical complications, rate of spinal cord injury, and rates of surgical intervention were assessed at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 9,026 patients were identified in this study with 4,513 patients presenting with sternal and thoracic spine fractures and 4,513 patients in the control group. Sternal and vertebral fracture coinjury was associated with higher rates of spinal cord injury (P < 0.0001), higher rates for spinal decompression/fusion (odds ratio = 4.38, P < 0.0001), and higher rates of thoracic surgery (odds ratio = 3.0, P < 0.0001). These patients were also statistically markedly more likely to develop hemodynamic, respiratory, cardiac, and renal complications (P < 0.001) at 90 days. DISCUSSION: Patients with thoracic spine fractures who sustain simultaneous sternal fractures are markedly more likely to have concomitant spinal cord injury, require spinal stabilization or decompression, and develop medical complications. Our findings point toward the role of the sternum as a fourth column of stability in cases of thoracic spinal fractures, which mitigate complications, surgery, and neurologic injury in cases of trauma.

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Georgetown University (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), Universidade Federal do Amapá (BR), C and D (Czechia) (CZ), Mefi (Czechia) (CZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.