Socioeconomic status mostly outweighs psychological factors in predicting individual ecological footprints

In light of current risks posed by greenhouse gas emissions, it is important to obtain a deeper understanding of individual ecological footprints to devise effective mitigation strategies. This pre-registered survey study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status, psychological factors, and people’s ecological footprints in representative samples from six G7 countries (N = 5069). While psychological factors, especially biospheric values, are linked to smaller ecological footprints, socioeconomic status has a more substantial role; individuals high in socioeconomic status have larger footprints, primarily due to their increased transport activity (air and car travel). Counterintuitively, the stronger their pro-environmental stance, the larger their footprint. The implication is that pro-environmental values alone cannot mitigate climate change, especially among affluent populations. Instead, targeted mitigation strategies addressing lifestyle conditions and high-impact behaviours, such as air travel, are essential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.129461
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic status mostly outweighs psychological factors in predicting individual ecological footprints

L.A Reisch, M Dewies, M Kaiser, D Lin et al.
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Socioeconomic status mostly outweighs psychological factors in predicting individual ecological footprints

L.A Reisch, M Dewies, M Kaiser, D Lin, CR Sunstein
article en

Abstract

In light of current risks posed by greenhouse gas emissions, it is important to obtain a deeper understanding of individual ecological footprints to devise effective mitigation strategies. This pre-registered survey study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status, psychological factors, and people’s ecological footprints in representative samples from six G7 countries (N = 5069). While psychological factors, especially biospheric values, are linked to smaller ecological footprints, socioeconomic status has a more substantial role; individuals high in socioeconomic status have larger footprints, primarily due to their increased transport activity (air and car travel). Counterintuitively, the stronger their pro-environmental stance, the larger their footprint. The implication is that pro-environmental values alone cannot mitigate climate change, especially among affluent populations. Instead, targeted mitigation strategies addressing lifestyle conditions and high-impact behaviours, such as air travel, are essential.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.