Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Phenotypic Detection of Virulence Factors of Non-fermenting Gram-negative Bacilli Isolated from Canine Clinical Infections

Non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) are increasingly implicated in persistent and multidrug-resistant infections in companion animals, prompting the present investigation to assess their prevalence, identification, antimicrobial resistance, virulence attributes, and genomic characteristics in canine clinical infections, with particular emphasis on Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species. A total of 402 clinical samples collected from dogs with diverse clinical conditions were processed for bacteriological examination, of which 332 samples (82.6%) yielded bacterial growth, and 73 isolates (21.7%) were identified as NFGNB. Samples were processed using standard microbiological techniques. Isolation was performed through enrichment in nutrient broth, followed by culture on nutrient agar and MacConkey agar. Among these, Pseudomonas spp. Constituted 19.0% (63/332), Acinetobacter spp. 2.7% (9/332) and Sphingomonas spp. 0.3% (1/332) with otitis and wound infections representing the major sources. Cultural and biochemical characterisation showed that all NFGNB produced non-lactose-fermenting colonies on Macconkey agar; in the oxidative–fermentative (of) test, both Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter isolates demonstrated oxidative utilization of glucose without fermentation, supporting their classification as non-fermenters. Phenotypically, all pseudomonas isolates were motile and oxidase- and catalase-positive, whereas Acinetobacter isolates were non-motile and oxidase-negative; hemolytic activity was observed in 93.7% (59/63) of Pseudomonas isolates, while none of the Acinetobacter isolates exhibited hemolysis, and biofilm formation was detected in 63.5% of Pseudomonas and 33.3% of Acinetobacter isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated a high burden of multidrug resistance, with Pseudomonas spp. showing resistance to cephalothin (57.14%), cefotaxime (53.97%), ceftazidime (52.38%), imipenem (34.92%), meropenem (19.05%), and colistin (30.16%), while Acinetobacter spp. exhibited marked resistance to oxacillin (88.89%), co-trimoxazole (77.78%), cefotaxime (66.67%), ceftazidime (66.67%), imipenem (44.44%), and meropenem (33.33%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2026/v29i53900
Primary Topic
Veterinary Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Phenotypic Detection of Virulence Factors of Non-fermenting Gram-negative Bacilli Isolated from Canine Clinical Infections

Udit Jain, Rashmi Singh, Barkha Sharma, Pooja Dawar et al.
Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology
Veterinary Oncology Research
article

Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Phenotypic Detection of Virulence Factors of Non-fermenting Gram-negative Bacilli Isolated from Canine Clinical Infections

Udit Jain, Rashmi Singh, Barkha Sharma, Pooja Dawar, Anjali Singh, Aditya Sharma, Ajay Pratap Singh
article en

Abstract

Non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) are increasingly implicated in persistent and multidrug-resistant infections in companion animals, prompting the present investigation to assess their prevalence, identification, antimicrobial resistance, virulence attributes, and genomic characteristics in canine clinical infections, with particular emphasis on Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species. A total of 402 clinical samples collected from dogs with diverse clinical conditions were processed for bacteriological examination, of which 332 samples (82.6%) yielded bacterial growth, and 73 isolates (21.7%) were identified as NFGNB. Samples were processed using standard microbiological techniques. Isolation was performed through enrichment in nutrient broth, followed by culture on nutrient agar and MacConkey agar. Among these, Pseudomonas spp. Constituted 19.0% (63/332), Acinetobacter spp. 2.7% (9/332) and Sphingomonas spp. 0.3% (1/332) with otitis and wound infections representing the major sources. Cultural and biochemical characterisation showed that all NFGNB produced non-lactose-fermenting colonies on Macconkey agar; in the oxidative–fermentative (of) test, both Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter isolates demonstrated oxidative utilization of glucose without fermentation, supporting their classification as non-fermenters. Phenotypically, all pseudomonas isolates were motile and oxidase- and catalase-positive, whereas Acinetobacter isolates were non-motile and oxidase-negative; hemolytic activity was observed in 93.7% (59/63) of Pseudomonas isolates, while none of the Acinetobacter isolates exhibited hemolysis, and biofilm formation was detected in 63.5% of Pseudomonas and 33.3% of Acinetobacter isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated a high burden of multidrug resistance, with Pseudomonas spp. showing resistance to cephalothin (57.14%), cefotaxime (53.97%), ceftazidime (52.38%), imipenem (34.92%), meropenem (19.05%), and colistin (30.16%), while Acinetobacter spp. exhibited marked resistance to oxacillin (88.89%), co-trimoxazole (77.78%), cefotaxime (66.67%), ceftazidime (66.67%), imipenem (44.44%), and meropenem (33.33%).

Journal of Advances in Biology & BiotechnologyVol. 29(5)
Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go-Anusandhan Sansthan (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Veterinary Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.