Who Are the Others? An Ecological Analysis of Significant Others in Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse

Intrafamilial child sexual abuse (CSA) is often seen as a private, dyadic interaction between a victim and perpetrator. Yet, emerging evidence suggests it is frequently embedded in broader family ecologies where others are present. Despite this, little is known about these "others" and how children perceive and interpret their presence. Therefore, the current study centers on the narratives of adults who experienced intrafamilial CSA in the presence of significant others. It examines two core questions: (1) Who are the "others" present during incidents of intrafamilial CSA? and (2) How do children interpret the presence of these individuals? Eighteen adult survivors (aged 26-62) participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to identify and interpret patterns of meaning, supported by peer debriefing, audit trails, and ongoing reflexivity to ensure rigor and interpretive depth. The findings indicate that "others" were present during the abuse across all ecological layers of the participants' childhoods. At the microsystem level, mothers, siblings, extended family members, educators, and community figures were perceived as present. At the exosystem level, welfare and educational professionals were viewed as influential actors who knew or should have known about the abuse. At the intrapersonal level, the absence of acknowledgment created profound disruptions in internal validity, leaving children uncertain about the factual, cognitive, and moral meaning of their experiences. The study emphasizes the need for trauma-responsive, acknowledgment-centered practices that understand intrafamilial CSA as a relational and systemic phenomenon. It calls for multidisciplinary interventions and greater institutional responsibility in recognizing and validating children's experiences across ecological contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261438063
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Are the Others? An Ecological Analysis of Significant Others in Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse

Bella Klebanov
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Who Are the Others? An Ecological Analysis of Significant Others in Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse

Bella Klebanov
article en

Abstract

Intrafamilial child sexual abuse (CSA) is often seen as a private, dyadic interaction between a victim and perpetrator. Yet, emerging evidence suggests it is frequently embedded in broader family ecologies where others are present. Despite this, little is known about these "others" and how children perceive and interpret their presence. Therefore, the current study centers on the narratives of adults who experienced intrafamilial CSA in the presence of significant others. It examines two core questions: (1) Who are the "others" present during incidents of intrafamilial CSA? and (2) How do children interpret the presence of these individuals? Eighteen adult survivors (aged 26-62) participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to identify and interpret patterns of meaning, supported by peer debriefing, audit trails, and ongoing reflexivity to ensure rigor and interpretive depth. The findings indicate that "others" were present during the abuse across all ecological layers of the participants' childhoods. At the microsystem level, mothers, siblings, extended family members, educators, and community figures were perceived as present. At the exosystem level, welfare and educational professionals were viewed as influential actors who knew or should have known about the abuse. At the intrapersonal level, the absence of acknowledgment created profound disruptions in internal validity, leaving children uncertain about the factual, cognitive, and moral meaning of their experiences. The study emphasizes the need for trauma-responsive, acknowledgment-centered practices that understand intrafamilial CSA as a relational and systemic phenomenon. It calls for multidisciplinary interventions and greater institutional responsibility in recognizing and validating children's experiences across ecological contexts.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
McGill University (CA)
Israel Science Foundation
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.