Talking AI: how conversational styles shape consumer attitudes in hedonic and utilitarian contexts

Purpose This study investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) voice assistants (VAs)' conversational styles on consumer attitudes. This study addresses the following research questions: 1. How do AI conversation styles (abstract vs concrete) influence consumer attitudes in hedonic and utilitarian service contexts? 2. What role does regulatory focus (promotion vs prevention) play in moderating the relationship between AI conversation styles and consumer attitudes? 3. How can AI developers optimize conversation styles to enhance user satisfaction and engagement based on service context and regulatory focus?. Design/methodology/approach Four experiments were conducted to explore the effect of AI VAs' conversational styles on consumer attitudes. Findings The results indicate a significant interaction between conversational styles, usage context and regulatory focus. In hedonic contexts, an abstract conversational style enhances consumers' positive attitudes, whereas in utilitarian contexts, a concrete conversational style has a more pronounced effect. Additionally, consumers with a promotion focus tend to evaluate abstract conversational styles more favorably, while those with a prevention focus exhibit a preference for concrete conversational styles. These findings offer valuable insights for designing AI VAs, suggesting that optimizing conversational style based on usage context and consumers' psychological states can enhance user satisfaction. Originality/value This research offers a comprehensive understanding of when and how AI conversation styles should be tailored to optimize consumer satisfaction and engagement. From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the literature by integrating service context and regulatory focus into the discourse on AI conversation styles. It provides a nuanced framework for designing AI VAs that resonate with users’ emotional and functional needs across different contexts. Managerially, the findings offer actionable insights for AI developers and marketers to enhance user experience by customizing conversation styles according to specific usage scenarios and user psychological orientations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-03-2025-0206
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Talking AI: how conversational styles shape consumer attitudes in hedonic and utilitarian contexts

Kyung-Min Kim, Sangwon Lee, Suo-Wen Li, Yang Pan
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
AI in Service Interactions
article

Talking AI: how conversational styles shape consumer attitudes in hedonic and utilitarian contexts

Kyung-Min Kim, Sangwon Lee, Suo-Wen Li, Yang Pan
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) voice assistants (VAs)' conversational styles on consumer attitudes. This study addresses the following research questions: 1. How do AI conversation styles (abstract vs concrete) influence consumer attitudes in hedonic and utilitarian service contexts? 2. What role does regulatory focus (promotion vs prevention) play in moderating the relationship between AI conversation styles and consumer attitudes? 3. How can AI developers optimize conversation styles to enhance user satisfaction and engagement based on service context and regulatory focus?. Design/methodology/approach Four experiments were conducted to explore the effect of AI VAs' conversational styles on consumer attitudes. Findings The results indicate a significant interaction between conversational styles, usage context and regulatory focus. In hedonic contexts, an abstract conversational style enhances consumers' positive attitudes, whereas in utilitarian contexts, a concrete conversational style has a more pronounced effect. Additionally, consumers with a promotion focus tend to evaluate abstract conversational styles more favorably, while those with a prevention focus exhibit a preference for concrete conversational styles. These findings offer valuable insights for designing AI VAs, suggesting that optimizing conversational style based on usage context and consumers' psychological states can enhance user satisfaction. Originality/value This research offers a comprehensive understanding of when and how AI conversation styles should be tailored to optimize consumer satisfaction and engagement. From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the literature by integrating service context and regulatory focus into the discourse on AI conversation styles. It provides a nuanced framework for designing AI VAs that resonate with users’ emotional and functional needs across different contexts. Managerially, the findings offer actionable insights for AI developers and marketers to enhance user experience by customizing conversation styles according to specific usage scenarios and user psychological orientations.

Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Ball State University (US), Silla University (KR), Qingdao Huanghai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.