Biophysical and Raman Spectroscopy assessment of drug-induced photosensitivity: Insights from a randomised controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced photosensitivity is a recognised adverse reaction, yet systematic quantification remains limited. This study investigates the quantitative impact of commonly prescribed drugs on human skin physiology following oral intake and subsequent UV exposure. METHODS: Ten drugs with known photosensitising potential were selected: acetylsalicylic acid, amiodarone, diclofenac, doxycycline, enalapril, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, pantoprazole, verapamil, and voriconazole. Twelve healthy volunteers received five allocated substances, separated by washout periods. Defined skin areas were exposed to gradual UVA and UVB doses according to individual skin type. Skin parameters including confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum (SC) hydration, skin surface pH, melanin and erythema indices were measured 24 h after exposure. RESULTS: Highest increase in erythema was caused by enalapril, amiodarone, furosemide and verapamil in response to both UVA and UVB irradiation. UVA predominantly increased melanin levels, while UVB caused pronounced erythema. No deterioration of natural moisturising factor or urea was observed throughout the entire analysed skin depth; TEWL remained unaffected. Trends towards increased SC hydration after irradiation were noted, but CRS analysis of minimal erythema dose skin sites did not reveal significantly increased water mass within the upper 30 µm of the skin. Average skin pH increase remained below 10%. CONCLUSION: The study underlines the need for standardisation of assessment tools for evaluating drug-induced photosensitivity, which complement visual evaluation. The marked interindividual variability across all skin parameters demonstrates the complexity of skin reactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2026.107537
Primary Topic
Skin Protection and Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biophysical and Raman Spectroscopy assessment of drug-induced photosensitivity: Insights from a randomised controlled pilot study

Julia Deinsberger, Katja Steiner, Benedikt Weber, Michael Wolzt et al.
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Skin Protection and Aging
article

Biophysical and Raman Spectroscopy assessment of drug-induced photosensitivity: Insights from a randomised controlled pilot study

Julia Deinsberger, Katja Steiner, Benedikt Weber, Michael Wolzt, Victoria Klang, M. Sälzer, Pia Hübel, Judith Hochrainer, Karolina Anderle, Anna-Sophie Zulus, Martin Peter Kubatzki, Richard Crevenna, Verena von Aufschnaiter, Mohammad Keilani
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced photosensitivity is a recognised adverse reaction, yet systematic quantification remains limited. This study investigates the quantitative impact of commonly prescribed drugs on human skin physiology following oral intake and subsequent UV exposure. METHODS: Ten drugs with known photosensitising potential were selected: acetylsalicylic acid, amiodarone, diclofenac, doxycycline, enalapril, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, pantoprazole, verapamil, and voriconazole. Twelve healthy volunteers received five allocated substances, separated by washout periods. Defined skin areas were exposed to gradual UVA and UVB doses according to individual skin type. Skin parameters including confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum (SC) hydration, skin surface pH, melanin and erythema indices were measured 24 h after exposure. RESULTS: Highest increase in erythema was caused by enalapril, amiodarone, furosemide and verapamil in response to both UVA and UVB irradiation. UVA predominantly increased melanin levels, while UVB caused pronounced erythema. No deterioration of natural moisturising factor or urea was observed throughout the entire analysed skin depth; TEWL remained unaffected. Trends towards increased SC hydration after irradiation were noted, but CRS analysis of minimal erythema dose skin sites did not reveal significantly increased water mass within the upper 30 µm of the skin. Average skin pH increase remained below 10%. CONCLUSION: The study underlines the need for standardisation of assessment tools for evaluating drug-induced photosensitivity, which complement visual evaluation. The marked interindividual variability across all skin parameters demonstrates the complexity of skin reactions.

European Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesVol. 221
University of Vienna (AT), Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering (Austria) (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Skin Protection and Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.