Addressing wound healing barriers to optimise wound progression: investigating the advanced benefits of a next-generation multilayer foam dressing

OBJECTIVE: Excess wound exudate can cause tissue maceration and delayed healing. Fluctuating exudate levels, combined with the impact of gravity, increase dressing leakage risk, affecting patient quality of life. Bacteria and proteases found in hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds pose additional barriers to healing if not promptly removed. Absorbent dressings must therefore address these multiple challenges, and so were explored in this series of preclinical investigations. METHOD: Standard in vitro absorbency tests were conducted to compare the performance of several dressings with a new advanced five-layer silicone polyurethane foam dressing with superabsorbent particles (ASFS). Dressing functionality was explored using clinically relevant test conditions, including the impact of gravity and fluid bolus events on absorbency, combined with the dressing's ability to absorb and retain bacteria and proteases. RESULTS: ASFS demonstrated superior performance across standard absorbency tests versus most of the alternative absorbent dressings and outperformed a comparator five-layer silicone foam dressing with superabsorbent fibres (SFD) in run-off testing. Under clinically relevant dynamic bolus conditions, including gravitational challenge, no leakage was observed with ASFS, whereas dressing failure due to fluid spill or leakage was observed with SFD. ASFS was also shown to retain matrix metalloproteinases and the majority of bacteria, even under increasing fluid volumes. CONCLUSION: Functionality of absorbent wound dressings in both standard and clinically relevant tests is critical to support healthcare professionals' decision-making in selecting optimal interventions for their patients' wounds. Effective exudate management combined with removal of bacteria and proteases by the new ASFS dressing supports healthcare professional and patient confidence in continuing with daily activities, with the potential for fewer dressing changes and associated resource benefits, warranting further evaluation in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wound Care
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2026.0135
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing wound healing barriers to optimise wound progression: investigating the advanced benefits of a next-generation multilayer foam dressing

Kamaluddeen Garba, Karen Ousey, Varuni Brownhill, Peter Worsley et al.
Journal of Wound Care
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Addressing wound healing barriers to optimise wound progression: investigating the advanced benefits of a next-generation multilayer foam dressing

Kamaluddeen Garba, Karen Ousey, Varuni Brownhill, Peter Worsley, Daniel Fitzgerald, Jessica Winks, Damaris Williams, Bashir Lwaleed
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Excess wound exudate can cause tissue maceration and delayed healing. Fluctuating exudate levels, combined with the impact of gravity, increase dressing leakage risk, affecting patient quality of life. Bacteria and proteases found in hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds pose additional barriers to healing if not promptly removed. Absorbent dressings must therefore address these multiple challenges, and so were explored in this series of preclinical investigations. METHOD: Standard in vitro absorbency tests were conducted to compare the performance of several dressings with a new advanced five-layer silicone polyurethane foam dressing with superabsorbent particles (ASFS). Dressing functionality was explored using clinically relevant test conditions, including the impact of gravity and fluid bolus events on absorbency, combined with the dressing's ability to absorb and retain bacteria and proteases. RESULTS: ASFS demonstrated superior performance across standard absorbency tests versus most of the alternative absorbent dressings and outperformed a comparator five-layer silicone foam dressing with superabsorbent fibres (SFD) in run-off testing. Under clinically relevant dynamic bolus conditions, including gravitational challenge, no leakage was observed with ASFS, whereas dressing failure due to fluid spill or leakage was observed with SFD. ASFS was also shown to retain matrix metalloproteinases and the majority of bacteria, even under increasing fluid volumes. CONCLUSION: Functionality of absorbent wound dressings in both standard and clinically relevant tests is critical to support healthcare professionals' decision-making in selecting optimal interventions for their patients' wounds. Effective exudate management combined with removal of bacteria and proteases by the new ASFS dressing supports healthcare professional and patient confidence in continuing with daily activities, with the potential for fewer dressing changes and associated resource benefits, warranting further evaluation in clinical practice.

Journal of Wound CareVol. 35(5)
University of Huddersfield (GB), Southampton General Hospital (GB), Smith & Nephew (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.