Exploring exchange and influence legitimacy in sustainable urban mobility schemes: a case study of Kristiansund’s city package

This paper explores the exchange and influence legitimacy in Kristiansund’s City Package. While much of the existing literature focuses on larger Norwegian cities, smaller cities with unique contextual challenges remain underexplored, complicating the transfer of urban strategies from larger contexts. Findings from analysing the content of official documents, media articles, and interviews revealed that decision-making processes were predominantly top-down, with the regulatory and incentivising measures of exchange legitimacy unequally distributed in terms of proximity to incentives. Influence legitimacy was primarily concentrated among politicians and bureaucrats, with public inclusion limited to post hoc endorsement of policies adopted elsewhere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2026.2660516
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring exchange and influence legitimacy in sustainable urban mobility schemes: a case study of Kristiansund’s city package

Marko Begović, Faris Henry Gergis
International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Exploring exchange and influence legitimacy in sustainable urban mobility schemes: a case study of Kristiansund’s city package

Marko Begović, Faris Henry Gergis
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the exchange and influence legitimacy in Kristiansund’s City Package. While much of the existing literature focuses on larger Norwegian cities, smaller cities with unique contextual challenges remain underexplored, complicating the transfer of urban strategies from larger contexts. Findings from analysing the content of official documents, media articles, and interviews revealed that decision-making processes were predominantly top-down, with the regulatory and incentivising measures of exchange legitimacy unequally distributed in terms of proximity to incentives. Influence legitimacy was primarily concentrated among politicians and bureaucrats, with public inclusion limited to post hoc endorsement of policies adopted elsewhere.

International Journal of Urban Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 18(1)
Molde University College (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.