Impact of methotrexate and etanercept drugs on serum levels of soluble toll-like receptor-2 in Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Methotrexate and Etanercept are common treatment strategies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are classified as conventional synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs respectively. Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2) is a transmembrane protein that plays a significant role in the innate immune and recognizes different patterns of molecules. This study aims to clarify the potential impact of these treatments on serum levels of soluble TLR-2 (sTLR-2) in RA patients, and explore the potential characteristics of sTLR‑2 as a candidate biomarker for monitoring therapeutic efficiency. Serum sTLR-2 levels were measured in 85 RA patients and 38 controls using an ELISA assay. Patients were categorized into three groups: 20 patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy, 40 receiving etanercept monotherapy, 25 receiving of combined therapy. Inflammatory tests: ACPA, ESR, CRP, and RF were measured. Demographic factors: age, BMI, DAS28-CRP, and disease duration were also evaluated. The mean of age and n (%) of sex for patients were matched to controls (P > 0.05). The mean ± SD of sTLR2 was elevated significantly in etanercept therapy group than the control (10.7 ± 4.9 vs7.8 ± 2.79, P = 0.03 respectively), and lowered in the methotrexate group (7.5 ± 2.89, P = 0.04) than etanercept group. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that sTLR-2 had a significant predictive probability for RA disease development, (β: 0.119, OR: 1.126, P:0.045), significant predictive probability for potentially etanercept treatment response (β: 0.26, OR: 1.297, P: 0.004) and non-significant to methotrexate response (β: -0.035, OR: 0.965, P = 0.72). ROC analysis showed a fair accuracy for discrimination etanercept-treated RA patients from controls (AUC: 0.7, P: 0.0012, 95% sensitivity, 42.1% specificity at > 6.51 ng/ml cutoff value). Circulating sTLR‑2 levels are differentially influenced by methotrexate and etanercept therapies in RA patients. Elevated sTLR‑2 in etanercept‑treated RA patients, together with its predictive probability and fair discriminatory accuracy, supports its potential as a biomarker for tracking the efficiency of etanercept monotherapy, but requires validation in larger longitudinal studies. In contrast, methotrexate showed no significant predictive association, underscoring sTLR‑2’s selective utility in biologic treatment evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43166-026-00405-0
Primary Topic
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of methotrexate and etanercept drugs on serum levels of soluble toll-like receptor-2 in Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Fayhaa M. Khaleel, Faiq I. Gorial, Muna R. Hameed
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
article

Impact of methotrexate and etanercept drugs on serum levels of soluble toll-like receptor-2 in Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Fayhaa M. Khaleel, Faiq I. Gorial, Muna R. Hameed
article en

Abstract

Methotrexate and Etanercept are common treatment strategies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are classified as conventional synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs respectively. Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2) is a transmembrane protein that plays a significant role in the innate immune and recognizes different patterns of molecules. This study aims to clarify the potential impact of these treatments on serum levels of soluble TLR-2 (sTLR-2) in RA patients, and explore the potential characteristics of sTLR‑2 as a candidate biomarker for monitoring therapeutic efficiency. Serum sTLR-2 levels were measured in 85 RA patients and 38 controls using an ELISA assay. Patients were categorized into three groups: 20 patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy, 40 receiving etanercept monotherapy, 25 receiving of combined therapy. Inflammatory tests: ACPA, ESR, CRP, and RF were measured. Demographic factors: age, BMI, DAS28-CRP, and disease duration were also evaluated. The mean of age and n (%) of sex for patients were matched to controls (P > 0.05). The mean ± SD of sTLR2 was elevated significantly in etanercept therapy group than the control (10.7 ± 4.9 vs7.8 ± 2.79, P = 0.03 respectively), and lowered in the methotrexate group (7.5 ± 2.89, P = 0.04) than etanercept group. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that sTLR-2 had a significant predictive probability for RA disease development, (β: 0.119, OR: 1.126, P:0.045), significant predictive probability for potentially etanercept treatment response (β: 0.26, OR: 1.297, P: 0.004) and non-significant to methotrexate response (β: -0.035, OR: 0.965, P = 0.72). ROC analysis showed a fair accuracy for discrimination etanercept-treated RA patients from controls (AUC: 0.7, P: 0.0012, 95% sensitivity, 42.1% specificity at > 6.51 ng/ml cutoff value). Circulating sTLR‑2 levels are differentially influenced by methotrexate and etanercept therapies in RA patients. Elevated sTLR‑2 in etanercept‑treated RA patients, together with its predictive probability and fair discriminatory accuracy, supports its potential as a biomarker for tracking the efficiency of etanercept monotherapy, but requires validation in larger longitudinal studies. In contrast, methotrexate showed no significant predictive association, underscoring sTLR‑2’s selective utility in biologic treatment evaluation.

Egyptian Rheumatology and RehabilitationVol. 53(1)
Ministry of Science and Technology (BA), University of Baghdad (IQ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.