“It’s Not Really Geared to Include the Father”: System-Involved Fathers’ Narratives of Penal-Welfare Hybridity

System-involved fathers face barriers that limit their ability to cultivate healthy relationships with their children. This study examines how fathers describe institutional intersectionality or the hybridity of multiple-system involvement. Focus groups with system-involved fathers ( N = 17) were conducted between 2021 and 2022, following completion of the 24-7 Dad® parenting program. Data were analyzed drawing upon a thematic analysis of hybridity. Findings show that the cyclical nature of involvement across child welfare, child support, and criminal justice forms a hybrid cycle of penalization or injustice due to mother-centricity, cultural mistrust, and societal devaluation. Racism and poverty further intensify penalization. A conceptual model outlining pathways of penalization is proposed. Interventions must center father-inclusive practices and promote a cultural reframing of fathers’ value. Future research should validate the model in other contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894261423058
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It’s Not Really Geared to Include the Father”: System-Involved Fathers’ Narratives of Penal-Welfare Hybridity

Antonio R. Garcia, Rafael Pérez‐Figueroa, Kendra Eubank, David Cozart et al.
Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

“It’s Not Really Geared to Include the Father”: System-Involved Fathers’ Narratives of Penal-Welfare Hybridity

Antonio R. Garcia, Rafael Pérez‐Figueroa, Kendra Eubank, David Cozart, Jeff Damron, Victoria Cook
article en

Abstract

System-involved fathers face barriers that limit their ability to cultivate healthy relationships with their children. This study examines how fathers describe institutional intersectionality or the hybridity of multiple-system involvement. Focus groups with system-involved fathers ( N = 17) were conducted between 2021 and 2022, following completion of the 24-7 Dad® parenting program. Data were analyzed drawing upon a thematic analysis of hybridity. Findings show that the cyclical nature of involvement across child welfare, child support, and criminal justice forms a hybrid cycle of penalization or injustice due to mother-centricity, cultural mistrust, and societal devaluation. Racism and poverty further intensify penalization. A conceptual model outlining pathways of penalization is proposed. Interventions must center father-inclusive practices and promote a cultural reframing of fathers’ value. Future research should validate the model in other contexts.

Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Kentucky (US), Families USA (US)
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.