Online consent risk-warnings about negative psychological side-effects do not change participant expectations or cause negative psychological side-effects

= 200) to encounter a risk-warning (e.g. "you may experience distress") or no warning during informed consent procedures, prior to an online trauma analogue paradigm. Opposing our predictions-and signalling good news for Institutional Review Boards and researchers-we found no evidence that warned participants reported more negative expectancies or experienced psychological nocebo effects (e.g. distress). Because risk-warnings are used as a harm mitigation strategy, and we did not find that people's expectancies differed, our findings raise concerns over how effective risk-warnings are in guiding people's decision-making during the consent process. Thus, our research has implications for informing and warning participants in trauma-related research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2660165
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online consent risk-warnings about negative psychological side-effects do not change participant expectations or cause negative psychological side-effects

Victoria M. E. Bridgland, Melanie K. T. Takarangi, Nadine S. J. Stirling
Cognition & Emotion
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
article

Online consent risk-warnings about negative psychological side-effects do not change participant expectations or cause negative psychological side-effects

Victoria M. E. Bridgland, Melanie K. T. Takarangi, Nadine S. J. Stirling
article en

Abstract

= 200) to encounter a risk-warning (e.g. "you may experience distress") or no warning during informed consent procedures, prior to an online trauma analogue paradigm. Opposing our predictions-and signalling good news for Institutional Review Boards and researchers-we found no evidence that warned participants reported more negative expectancies or experienced psychological nocebo effects (e.g. distress). Because risk-warnings are used as a harm mitigation strategy, and we did not find that people's expectancies differed, our findings raise concerns over how effective risk-warnings are in guiding people's decision-making during the consent process. Thus, our research has implications for informing and warning participants in trauma-related research.

Cognition & Emotion
Flinders University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.