Expansion of Tourism Infrastructure Can Be Beneficial for Geoheritage: Evidence from the Western Caucasus

Geoheritage is commonly regarded as an important natural resource for tourism, but the latter can be a factor of risk to the former. A case study in the Western Caucasus, where the rural area of Mountainous Adygeya hosts many geosites (including those that are globally and nationally ranked), sheds light on a novel dimension of the aforementioned nexus, namely benefits to geoheritage from expansion of tourism infrastructure. The latter has grown remarkably in the study area during the past fifteen years. A comparison of 25 geosites as they were in 2010 and 2025 indicates their changes, which can be treated as positive and negative effects of the expansion of tourism infrastructure. Particularly, it is established that this expansion was responsible for the creation of one geosite, the extension of three previously existing geosites, the specialists’ awareness of an additional object, as well as for the improved accessibility of 12 geosites. Several negative effects are also documented, but they are neither major nor widespread due to the superb local environmental management. This example demonstrates that the rapid expansion of tourism infrastructure in rural, geoheritage-rich areas can contribute to their sustainability and not only challenges it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heritage
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9040156
Primary Topic
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expansion of Tourism Infrastructure Can Be Beneficial for Geoheritage: Evidence from the Western Caucasus

Anna V. Mikhailenko, Dmitry A. Ruban
Heritage
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
article

Expansion of Tourism Infrastructure Can Be Beneficial for Geoheritage: Evidence from the Western Caucasus

Anna V. Mikhailenko, Dmitry A. Ruban
article en

Abstract

Geoheritage is commonly regarded as an important natural resource for tourism, but the latter can be a factor of risk to the former. A case study in the Western Caucasus, where the rural area of Mountainous Adygeya hosts many geosites (including those that are globally and nationally ranked), sheds light on a novel dimension of the aforementioned nexus, namely benefits to geoheritage from expansion of tourism infrastructure. The latter has grown remarkably in the study area during the past fifteen years. A comparison of 25 geosites as they were in 2010 and 2025 indicates their changes, which can be treated as positive and negative effects of the expansion of tourism infrastructure. Particularly, it is established that this expansion was responsible for the creation of one geosite, the extension of three previously existing geosites, the specialists’ awareness of an additional object, as well as for the improved accessibility of 12 geosites. Several negative effects are also documented, but they are neither major nor widespread due to the superb local environmental management. This example demonstrates that the rapid expansion of tourism infrastructure in rural, geoheritage-rich areas can contribute to their sustainability and not only challenges it.

HeritageVol. 9(4)
Southern Federal University (RU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.