Servicification in Global Value Chains and Services Trade Restrictions in Asian Economies

Global value chains have recently changed structurally (“servicification”)—that is, service sectors’ involvement in global value chain processes has become more intensive. We quantify services trade restrictions’ contribution to underdevelopment of global value chain servicification across Asian economies—an underexplored area. The study applies the “structural” gravity trade model and constructs panel data based on the 2025 Trade in Value Added and the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index database developed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The empirical analysis covers five major service sectors—trade, transport, I&C, finance, and professional services. First, global value chain servicification remains relatively underdeveloped in most emerging and developing Asian economies, particularly across several service categories. Second, services trade restrictions’ presence significantly and negatively affects global value chain servicification’s extent in these economies. Third, these restrictive measures account for approximately 30–60% of servicification’s observed underdevelopment. Regarding policy implications, removing or easing such trade restrictions could substantially promote global value chain servicification, enhancing productivity and integration for emerging and developing Asian economies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economies
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14040144
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Servicification in Global Value Chains and Services Trade Restrictions in Asian Economies

Hiroyuki Taguchi, Ni Lar
Economies
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Servicification in Global Value Chains and Services Trade Restrictions in Asian Economies

Hiroyuki Taguchi, Ni Lar
article en

Abstract

Global value chains have recently changed structurally (“servicification”)—that is, service sectors’ involvement in global value chain processes has become more intensive. We quantify services trade restrictions’ contribution to underdevelopment of global value chain servicification across Asian economies—an underexplored area. The study applies the “structural” gravity trade model and constructs panel data based on the 2025 Trade in Value Added and the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index database developed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The empirical analysis covers five major service sectors—trade, transport, I&C, finance, and professional services. First, global value chain servicification remains relatively underdeveloped in most emerging and developing Asian economies, particularly across several service categories. Second, services trade restrictions’ presence significantly and negatively affects global value chain servicification’s extent in these economies. Third, these restrictive measures account for approximately 30–60% of servicification’s observed underdevelopment. Regarding policy implications, removing or easing such trade restrictions could substantially promote global value chain servicification, enhancing productivity and integration for emerging and developing Asian economies.

EconomiesVol. 14(4)
Saitama University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.