Access to Fly: A Review of International, U.S., and Canadian Air Travel Policies for Passengers with Disabilities

People with disabilities continue to face significant barriers when flying, despite decades of policies enacted to protect their rights and ensure equitable and dignified access. These challenges are often linked not to a lack of policy but to inconsistencies, fragmentation, and unclear responsibilities across operators and jurisdictions. This review examines international, U.S., and Canadian air travel policies to assess their comprehensiveness, coherence, and alignment across jurisdictions, to promote accessible air travel for travelers with disabilities. We conducted a structured policy review following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We systematically identified, selected, charted, and analyzed 28 U.S. policies, Canadian policies, and international guidelines. Policy content was compared using the themes of a scoping review on air travel experiences of people with disabilities and the Disability Policy Lens to examine definitions, aims, and coverage. Findings highlighted substantial variation across jurisdictions in the allocation of responsibilities among actors and the specificity of policy provisions. These variations contribute to uneven interpretation and implementation of accessibility measures, shaping inconsistent travel experiences for people with disabilities. International guidelines have the potential to serve as an important reference point, but currently lack comprehensiveness. There is a need for greater cross-jurisdictional coherence in air travel policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disabilities
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities6020042
Primary Topic
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to Fly: A Review of International, U.S., and Canadian Air Travel Policies for Passengers with Disabilities

Delphine Labbé, Peter Athanasopoulos, Daryl Patrick Yao, Heather Ansley et al.
Disabilities
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
article

Access to Fly: A Review of International, U.S., and Canadian Air Travel Policies for Passengers with Disabilities

Delphine Labbé, Peter Athanasopoulos, Daryl Patrick Yao, Heather Ansley, William Cameron Miller
article en

Abstract

People with disabilities continue to face significant barriers when flying, despite decades of policies enacted to protect their rights and ensure equitable and dignified access. These challenges are often linked not to a lack of policy but to inconsistencies, fragmentation, and unclear responsibilities across operators and jurisdictions. This review examines international, U.S., and Canadian air travel policies to assess their comprehensiveness, coherence, and alignment across jurisdictions, to promote accessible air travel for travelers with disabilities. We conducted a structured policy review following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We systematically identified, selected, charted, and analyzed 28 U.S. policies, Canadian policies, and international guidelines. Policy content was compared using the themes of a scoping review on air travel experiences of people with disabilities and the Disability Policy Lens to examine definitions, aims, and coverage. Findings highlighted substantial variation across jurisdictions in the allocation of responsibilities among actors and the specificity of policy provisions. These variations contribute to uneven interpretation and implementation of accessibility measures, shaping inconsistent travel experiences for people with disabilities. International guidelines have the potential to serve as an important reference point, but currently lack comprehensiveness. There is a need for greater cross-jurisdictional coherence in air travel policies.

DisabilitiesVol. 6(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), Paralyzed Veterans of America (US), GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre (CA), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Spinal Cord Injury Ontario (CA)
Craig H. Neilsen Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.