The multiple instruments in China’s environmental enforcement:A case study of the Sembcorp Water Company case

The case of Nanjing Sembcorp Water Company, a subsidiary of Singapore-based Sembcorp (China) Investment Company, represents a landmark example of China’s evolving environmental liability system. From 2014 to 2017, the company illegally discharged high-concentration waste water into the Yangtze River, triggering administrative, criminal, and public interest legal actions. The case resulted in a record CNY470 million compensation, calculated using the virtual treatment costing method – CNY237 million paid in cash and CNY233 million for ecological restoration. A critical aspect of this case was the voluntary intervention of the parent company, Sembcorp (China) Investment Company, which assumed financial responsibility when the subsidiary proved incapable of full payment. This case exemplifies China’s integrated approach to environmental enforcement, combining deterrence with restoration, and offers valuable insights into corporate accountability and parent company liability. The findings have broader implications for global environmental governance, particularly in jurisdictions strengthening corporate environmental liability mechanisms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Published
2026-04-17
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The multiple instruments in China’s environmental enforcement:A case study of the Sembcorp Water Company case

Yan Houfu, M.G. Faure
Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Environmental law and policy
article

The multiple instruments in China’s environmental enforcement:A case study of the Sembcorp Water Company case

Yan Houfu, M.G. Faure
article en

Abstract

The case of Nanjing Sembcorp Water Company, a subsidiary of Singapore-based Sembcorp (China) Investment Company, represents a landmark example of China’s evolving environmental liability system. From 2014 to 2017, the company illegally discharged high-concentration waste water into the Yangtze River, triggering administrative, criminal, and public interest legal actions. The case resulted in a record CNY470 million compensation, calculated using the virtual treatment costing method – CNY237 million paid in cash and CNY233 million for ecological restoration. A critical aspect of this case was the voluntary intervention of the parent company, Sembcorp (China) Investment Company, which assumed financial responsibility when the subsidiary proved incapable of full payment. This case exemplifies China’s integrated approach to environmental enforcement, combining deterrence with restoration, and offers valuable insights into corporate accountability and parent company liability. The findings have broader implications for global environmental governance, particularly in jurisdictions strengthening corporate environmental liability mechanisms.

Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.