Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement using patient-specific prostheses: a multicentre analysis of functional and aesthetic outcomes

Total alloplastic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement with patient-specific prostheses is an established option for end-stage TMJ disease, but multicentre data integrating functional, pain, dietary, aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes are scarce. This retrospective multicentre cohort study assessed functional, pain, dietary, aesthetic and satisfaction outcomes after unilateral or bilateral patient-specific TMJ replacement in three tertiary units. Patients with ≥12 months' follow-up completed a postoperative questionnaire including the modified Helkimo index, diet score, numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain during function, modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, and modified FACE-Q "Satisfaction with Outcome" module (0-100). Eighty-nine patients (125 joints; mean age 50.6 years; mean follow-up 3.4 years) were included. The mean modified Helkimo index decreased from 14.0 to 3.8 and the mean diet score improved from 5.1 to 8.6 (both p < 0.001). At follow-up, mean pain NRS was 2.4, 30.3% were pain free and 75.3% reported NRS ≤3. Approximately 25% reported aesthetic improvement and 10% some worsening; the mean FACE-Q satisfaction score was 88.2/100 and 75.3% scored ≥80. Patient-specific TMJ replacement yielded substantial functional and dietary improvement, low residual pain and high satisfaction; aesthetic change was modest in many patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2026.104569
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement using patient-specific prostheses: a multicentre analysis of functional and aesthetic outcomes

Giovanni Gerbino, Ruben Poelaert, Federica Sobrero, Wilfried Cools et al.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement using patient-specific prostheses: a multicentre analysis of functional and aesthetic outcomes

Giovanni Gerbino, Ruben Poelaert, Federica Sobrero, Wilfried Cools, Vladimír Machoň, Maurice Y. Mommaerts, Maxim Valgaeren
article en

Abstract

Total alloplastic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement with patient-specific prostheses is an established option for end-stage TMJ disease, but multicentre data integrating functional, pain, dietary, aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes are scarce. This retrospective multicentre cohort study assessed functional, pain, dietary, aesthetic and satisfaction outcomes after unilateral or bilateral patient-specific TMJ replacement in three tertiary units. Patients with ≥12 months' follow-up completed a postoperative questionnaire including the modified Helkimo index, diet score, numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain during function, modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, and modified FACE-Q "Satisfaction with Outcome" module (0-100). Eighty-nine patients (125 joints; mean age 50.6 years; mean follow-up 3.4 years) were included. The mean modified Helkimo index decreased from 14.0 to 3.8 and the mean diet score improved from 5.1 to 8.6 (both p < 0.001). At follow-up, mean pain NRS was 2.4, 30.3% were pain free and 75.3% reported NRS ≤3. Approximately 25% reported aesthetic improvement and 10% some worsening; the mean FACE-Q satisfaction score was 88.2/100 and 75.3% scored ≥80. Patient-specific TMJ replacement yielded substantial functional and dietary improvement, low residual pain and high satisfaction; aesthetic change was modest in many patients.

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 54(7)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Charles University (CZ), Centre for European Policy Studies (BE), Department of Medical Sciences (BY), University of Turin (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.