Development of a universal approach for measuring servitization

Although interest in servitization is growing, researchers and practitioners lack a universally accepted approach to measure it in industrial firms. In this paper, we develop and empirically validate a comprehensive measurement approach to address this gap. We begin by defining servitization and critically reviewing existing measurement methods. We develop a three-test approach, refined through pre-pilot and pilot studies with industrial executives, followed by a nationwide survey of 701 firms. The approach captures three dimensions: revenue share between products and services, types of services offered, and revenue share from each service. This reduces construct ambiguity and supports more reliable empirical analysis and theory-building in business model innovation. We introduce 'servitization intensity' to quantify a firm’s service footprint and results confirm robustness and reveal variation in adoption. We propose a fourth test to capture scope of service offerings and provider responsibility to offer a richer and more accurate measurement of servitization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production Planning & Control
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2026.2652938
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a universal approach for measuring servitization

Chris Raddats, Mario Rapaccini, Tim Baines, Ali Ziaee Bigdeli et al.
Production Planning & Control
Service and Product Innovation
article

Development of a universal approach for measuring servitization

Chris Raddats, Mario Rapaccini, Tim Baines, Ali Ziaee Bigdeli, Raveen R. Menon, Anwar Adem, Dipti Rathi, Andreas Schroeder
article en

Abstract

Although interest in servitization is growing, researchers and practitioners lack a universally accepted approach to measure it in industrial firms. In this paper, we develop and empirically validate a comprehensive measurement approach to address this gap. We begin by defining servitization and critically reviewing existing measurement methods. We develop a three-test approach, refined through pre-pilot and pilot studies with industrial executives, followed by a nationwide survey of 701 firms. The approach captures three dimensions: revenue share between products and services, types of services offered, and revenue share from each service. This reduces construct ambiguity and supports more reliable empirical analysis and theory-building in business model innovation. We introduce 'servitization intensity' to quantify a firm’s service footprint and results confirm robustness and reveal variation in adoption. We propose a fourth test to capture scope of service offerings and provider responsibility to offer a richer and more accurate measurement of servitization.

Production Planning & Control
University of Liverpool (GB), Aston University (GB), University of Florence (IT), Lancaster University (GB)
University of Derby, UK Research and Innovation, University of Warwick, Aston University, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Service and Product Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.