Optimal umbilical artery Doppler chart for predicting placenta‐mediated fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive accuracy of selected umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) reference charts for outcomes associated with placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: percentile cut-off for UA-PI for the two primary outcomes. Given the distinct phenotypes of early- and late-onset FGR, we also performed an analysis stratified by gestational age at ultrasound examination (< 32 vs ≥ 32 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 15 841 patients, with 38 398 ultrasound examinations, were included in the analysis. The proportion of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses classified as FGR based on an abnormal UA-PI varied widely depending on which reference chart was applied, ranging from 2.2% to 25.7%. Similarly, the predictive accuracy of the 10 different reference charts for placenta-mediated FGR outcomes differed considerably. The predictive performance for late-stage UA Doppler abnormalities varied substantially across charts, with sensitivity ranging from 20.7% to 76.3% and specificity from 75.2% to 98.0%. Likewise, for the prediction of MVM on placental pathology, the sensitivity of the charts ranged from 6.8% to 42.0% and specificity from 77.5% to 98.6%. For most of the charts, sensitivity and specificity remained comparable between the overall cohort and gestational-age subgroups. When ranked according to overall predictive performance for the two primary outcomes using the Youden index, the UA-PI reference charts of Rahimi et al., Drukker et al. and Flatley et al. demonstrated the best overall predictive accuracy. These same three charts retained the top performance ranking for the prediction of primary study outcomes in the subgroup of cases examined < 32 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We observed substantial variation among 10 UA-PI reference charts in both the proportion of SGA fetuses classified as growth restricted and the predictive accuracy of each chart for outcomes considered specific to placenta-mediated FGR. Among the charts evaluated, those of Rahimi et al., Drukker et al. and Flately et al. demonstrated the best overall performance for predicting all three study outcomes. If confirmed in external cohorts, these findings would support the ongoing efforts to standardize the diagnosis of FGR, which is crucial for both clinical and research purposes. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.70222
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal umbilical artery Doppler chart for predicting placenta‐mediated fetal growth restriction

John‏ Kingdom, N. Melamed, O. Nevo, N. Kongkham et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Optimal umbilical artery Doppler chart for predicting placenta‐mediated fetal growth restriction

John‏ Kingdom, N. Melamed, O. Nevo, N. Kongkham, A. Vayenas, V. Stratulat, S. Rahimi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive accuracy of selected umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) reference charts for outcomes associated with placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: percentile cut-off for UA-PI for the two primary outcomes. Given the distinct phenotypes of early- and late-onset FGR, we also performed an analysis stratified by gestational age at ultrasound examination (< 32 vs ≥ 32 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 15 841 patients, with 38 398 ultrasound examinations, were included in the analysis. The proportion of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses classified as FGR based on an abnormal UA-PI varied widely depending on which reference chart was applied, ranging from 2.2% to 25.7%. Similarly, the predictive accuracy of the 10 different reference charts for placenta-mediated FGR outcomes differed considerably. The predictive performance for late-stage UA Doppler abnormalities varied substantially across charts, with sensitivity ranging from 20.7% to 76.3% and specificity from 75.2% to 98.0%. Likewise, for the prediction of MVM on placental pathology, the sensitivity of the charts ranged from 6.8% to 42.0% and specificity from 77.5% to 98.6%. For most of the charts, sensitivity and specificity remained comparable between the overall cohort and gestational-age subgroups. When ranked according to overall predictive performance for the two primary outcomes using the Youden index, the UA-PI reference charts of Rahimi et al., Drukker et al. and Flatley et al. demonstrated the best overall predictive accuracy. These same three charts retained the top performance ranking for the prediction of primary study outcomes in the subgroup of cases examined < 32 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We observed substantial variation among 10 UA-PI reference charts in both the proportion of SGA fetuses classified as growth restricted and the predictive accuracy of each chart for outcomes considered specific to placenta-mediated FGR. Among the charts evaluated, those of Rahimi et al., Drukker et al. and Flately et al. demonstrated the best overall performance for predicting all three study outcomes. If confirmed in external cohorts, these findings would support the ongoing efforts to standardize the diagnosis of FGR, which is crucial for both clinical and research purposes. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Mount Sinai Hospital (CA), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.