Exploration over Verification: Considering the Grounded Theory Method in <scp>TESOL</scp>

Abstract This article marks the 60th anniversary of TESOL Quarterly by revisiting the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) and illustrating its untapped potential for second language research and pedagogy. After tracing GTM's philosophical lineage to contemporary variants, the paper distils its core principles: exploration over verification, recursive data collection and analysis, constant comparison, theoretical sampling, and emergent theory specific to the contexts from which it was constructed. Two exemplary TESOL Quarterly studies – Moore's Critical GTM of L1 dissociation among Japanese‐English plurilinguals and Smith et al.'s constructivist investigation of multimodal composing – demonstrate how an exploratory use of GTM offers insight into underresearched areas of second language education and offers avenues for innovative responses. Rigorous guidelines are offered in order to demystify aspects of GTM, such as open, focused and theoretical coding, memoing. This article concludes by mapping future research tasks such as digital literacies, multilingual ecologies, and teacher trajectories. The conclusions are that GTM can help teacher‐researchers to look beyond simply verifying received theory, and to generate their own context‐sensitive theories that have the potential to both improve teacher insight and positively shape the future of second language instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TESOL Quarterly
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70118
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploration over Verification: Considering the Grounded Theory Method in TESOL

Gregory Hadley
TESOL Quarterly
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Exploration over Verification: Considering the Grounded Theory Method in TESOL

Gregory Hadley
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article marks the 60th anniversary of TESOL Quarterly by revisiting the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) and illustrating its untapped potential for second language research and pedagogy. After tracing GTM's philosophical lineage to contemporary variants, the paper distils its core principles: exploration over verification, recursive data collection and analysis, constant comparison, theoretical sampling, and emergent theory specific to the contexts from which it was constructed. Two exemplary TESOL Quarterly studies – Moore's Critical GTM of L1 dissociation among Japanese‐English plurilinguals and Smith et al.'s constructivist investigation of multimodal composing – demonstrate how an exploratory use of GTM offers insight into underresearched areas of second language education and offers avenues for innovative responses. Rigorous guidelines are offered in order to demystify aspects of GTM, such as open, focused and theoretical coding, memoing. This article concludes by mapping future research tasks such as digital literacies, multilingual ecologies, and teacher trajectories. The conclusions are that GTM can help teacher‐researchers to look beyond simply verifying received theory, and to generate their own context‐sensitive theories that have the potential to both improve teacher insight and positively shape the future of second language instruction.

TESOL Quarterly
Niigata University (JP), University of Birmingham (GB)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.