Thinking and doing differently: the immediate impact of entrepreneurship education on STEM PhD students

Abstract Existing evaluative frameworks for entrepreneurship education capture either short-term mindset changes or long-term venture outcomes, missing the immediate behavioural changes that can occur when training is delivered during rather than after the discovery process. This study examines the experiences of a cohort of PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in biotechnology and biomedical sciences following participation in an industry-embedded entrepreneurship education program. Using a two-stage qualitative analysis, we identify two dimensions of program impact: industry orientation —shifts in how participants understood the commercial, regulatory, and translational landscape of their sector—and industry-informed practice —concrete changes in what participants did differently within their ongoing research and industry engagement. We provide preliminary evidence that entrepreneurship education delivered during the discovery process produces both dimensions, with industry-informed practice representing a category of impact existing frameworks are not designed to detect. Findings have implications for the timing, content sequencing, and evaluation of doctoral entrepreneurship education programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-026-10339-6
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking and doing differently: the immediate impact of entrepreneurship education on STEM PhD students

Anna Jenkins, Lisette Pregelj, Giuliana Oyola-Lozada, Sam MacAulay
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Thinking and doing differently: the immediate impact of entrepreneurship education on STEM PhD students

Anna Jenkins, Lisette Pregelj, Giuliana Oyola-Lozada, Sam MacAulay
article en

Abstract

Abstract Existing evaluative frameworks for entrepreneurship education capture either short-term mindset changes or long-term venture outcomes, missing the immediate behavioural changes that can occur when training is delivered during rather than after the discovery process. This study examines the experiences of a cohort of PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in biotechnology and biomedical sciences following participation in an industry-embedded entrepreneurship education program. Using a two-stage qualitative analysis, we identify two dimensions of program impact: industry orientation —shifts in how participants understood the commercial, regulatory, and translational landscape of their sector—and industry-informed practice —concrete changes in what participants did differently within their ongoing research and industry engagement. We provide preliminary evidence that entrepreneurship education delivered during the discovery process produces both dimensions, with industry-informed practice representing a category of impact existing frameworks are not designed to detect. Findings have implications for the timing, content sequencing, and evaluation of doctoral entrepreneurship education programs.

The Journal of Technology Transfer
Esan University (PE), The University of Queensland (AU)
University of Queensland
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.