Failing to Use the Balance Sheet to Manage Cycle Shocks: Evidence from Nigeria

Nigeria entered the 2020 COVID-19-related oil price downturn without the fiscal buffers that numerous resource-rich economies had built over time. Despite heavy dependence on petroleum revenues, the country has made limited use of stabilization tools such as structured hedging programs, sovereign savings mechanisms, or strategic reserves, leaving public finances exposed to external shocks. Drawing on political choice theory and the resource governance literature, this study examines how institutional conditions shaped crisis management during the 2020 oil price collapse and the COVID-19 pandemic. The study combines qualitative institutional analysis with a stochastic counterfactual simulation. It compares Nigeria’s policy approach with those of oil-producing countries including Mexico, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Angola, and Ghana, using data from the IMF, World Bank, Afreximbank, and peer-reviewed sources. The counterfactual simulation is calibrated to Nigeria’s 2019 federal budget oil benchmark of US $60 per barrel, with the IMF’s 2019 petroleum price assumption used as a robustness check. The model treats hedging as a form of partial fiscal insurance rather than full stabilization. Results suggest that hedging sufficient to offset 10%, 20%, and 30% of the shock would have improved 2020 GDP decline from −1.80% to approximately −1.62%, −1.44%, and −1.26%, respectively. The analysis identifies institutional gaps in Nigeria’s use of hedging, sovereign savings, and reserve infrastructure. The counterfactual results indicate that even modest oil hedging could have meaningfully softened the 2020 downturn, with the 20% scenario reducing GDP contraction by an estimated 0.36 percentage points. These findings suggest that governance constraints contributed materially to fiscal vulnerability. The study proposes a four-pillar framework centered on risk hedging, revenue savings, strategic investment, and institutional reform to strengthen fiscal stability and resilience to external shocks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19040298
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failing to Use the Balance Sheet to Manage Cycle Shocks: Evidence from Nigeria

Akolisa Ufodike
Journal of risk and financial management
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Failing to Use the Balance Sheet to Manage Cycle Shocks: Evidence from Nigeria

Akolisa Ufodike
article en

Abstract

Nigeria entered the 2020 COVID-19-related oil price downturn without the fiscal buffers that numerous resource-rich economies had built over time. Despite heavy dependence on petroleum revenues, the country has made limited use of stabilization tools such as structured hedging programs, sovereign savings mechanisms, or strategic reserves, leaving public finances exposed to external shocks. Drawing on political choice theory and the resource governance literature, this study examines how institutional conditions shaped crisis management during the 2020 oil price collapse and the COVID-19 pandemic. The study combines qualitative institutional analysis with a stochastic counterfactual simulation. It compares Nigeria’s policy approach with those of oil-producing countries including Mexico, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Angola, and Ghana, using data from the IMF, World Bank, Afreximbank, and peer-reviewed sources. The counterfactual simulation is calibrated to Nigeria’s 2019 federal budget oil benchmark of US $60 per barrel, with the IMF’s 2019 petroleum price assumption used as a robustness check. The model treats hedging as a form of partial fiscal insurance rather than full stabilization. Results suggest that hedging sufficient to offset 10%, 20%, and 30% of the shock would have improved 2020 GDP decline from −1.80% to approximately −1.62%, −1.44%, and −1.26%, respectively. The analysis identifies institutional gaps in Nigeria’s use of hedging, sovereign savings, and reserve infrastructure. The counterfactual results indicate that even modest oil hedging could have meaningfully softened the 2020 downturn, with the 20% scenario reducing GDP contraction by an estimated 0.36 percentage points. These findings suggest that governance constraints contributed materially to fiscal vulnerability. The study proposes a four-pillar framework centered on risk hedging, revenue savings, strategic investment, and institutional reform to strengthen fiscal stability and resilience to external shocks.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(4)
University of Canterbury (NZ), York University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.