Why US–China relations have not escalated yet: Power rise, power transition, and perceptions of resolve

Abstract When do relations between a rising state and a hegemonic state deteriorate? Scholarship in international relations theory maintains that when the rising state meets the three criteria of the power transition theory baseline – higher growth rates, power parity, and frustration with the status quo – relations between it and the hegemonic state deteriorate. These conditions alone cannot explain the timing and shape of the rising state to challenge the hegemonic state. In this article we introduce scope and boundary conditions for power transition theory, focusing on the rising state’s challenge and its effects on power transition dynamics. We propose that a rising state’s challenge to the hegemonic state is contingent on two variables: only when the rising state translates its gross power rise into advanced military capabilities and perceives the hegemonic state to have low resolve will it escalate its strategy against the hegemonic state and deteriorate their relations. An examination of three case studies – US–China relations (1991–2024), Spain–Portugal relations (1469–94), and Germany–UK relations (1871–1914) – support this argument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of International Security
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2026.10061
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why US–China relations have not escalated yet: Power rise, power transition, and perceptions of resolve

Gustav Meibauer, Michiel Foulon
European Journal of International Security
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Why US–China relations have not escalated yet: Power rise, power transition, and perceptions of resolve

Gustav Meibauer, Michiel Foulon
article en

Abstract

Abstract When do relations between a rising state and a hegemonic state deteriorate? Scholarship in international relations theory maintains that when the rising state meets the three criteria of the power transition theory baseline – higher growth rates, power parity, and frustration with the status quo – relations between it and the hegemonic state deteriorate. These conditions alone cannot explain the timing and shape of the rising state to challenge the hegemonic state. In this article we introduce scope and boundary conditions for power transition theory, focusing on the rising state’s challenge and its effects on power transition dynamics. We propose that a rising state’s challenge to the hegemonic state is contingent on two variables: only when the rising state translates its gross power rise into advanced military capabilities and perceives the hegemonic state to have low resolve will it escalate its strategy against the hegemonic state and deteriorate their relations. An examination of three case studies – US–China relations (1991–2024), Spain–Portugal relations (1469–94), and Germany–UK relations (1871–1914) – support this argument.

European Journal of International Security
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Antwerp (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.