Assessment of infection prevention and control in public hospitals in the post war Tigray region of Ethiopia using the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF)

BACKGROUND: Strengthening infection prevention and control (IPC) is crucial for mitigating the risks of infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare facilities. The conflict in Tigray has had serious repercussions on the health system. This study aimed to assess the implementation of the IPC core components of (CC) public health facilities in post-war Tigray, Ethiopia, using the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC Assessment Framework (IPCAF) and hand hygiene self-assessment framework (HHSAF) standard tools. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted across 35 public health facilities comprising referral, general, and primary hospitals in Tigray state from June to July 2024. Data were collected by interviews of the IPC focal or managers at the accessible hospitals, using standardized WHO IPCAF and HHSAF tools. Descriptive statistics, including mean, median, interquartile range (IQR) and standard deviation, were utilized to summarize the data. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between IPCAF and HHSAF scores. An independent t-test was employed to compare mean IPCAF scores by type of healthcare facility. RESULTS: From a total of 35 eligible healthcare facilities invited, 33 participated in the survey, resulting in a 94% response rate. The mean age of respondents was 36 years (SD = 8), with an average of 10 service years (SD = 7). Most respondents were IPC focal persons (48.5%), followed by chief executive officers (27.3%). The median IPCAF score was 348 (IQR: 258-439), indicating a basic IPC level. Three facilities (9%) exhibited an inadequate IPC level, which means scores below 200. Twenty-one facilities (63.6%) demonstrated basic IPC levels, 8 facilities (24.2%) had intermediate IPC levels and only 1 facility (3%) achieved an advanced IPC level. A statistically significant positive correlation was identified between IPCAF and HHSAF scores (r = 0.765, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The levels of implementation of the WHO CC in post-war health facilities in Tigray were found to be unsatisfactory, with limitations evident across all zones and types of facilities. This situation increases the risk of healthcare-associated infections for healthcare personnel, patients, and visitors. A significant positive correlation was observed between IPCAF and HHSAF scores. Addressing the identified gaps through enhancements of IPC core components and capacity building is essential for preventing healthcare-associated infections. Longitudinal studies to monitor IPC implementations are recommended for ongoing assessment and improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-026-01746-3
Primary Topic
Ureteral procedures and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of infection prevention and control in public hospitals in the post war Tigray region of Ethiopia using the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF)

Ana Lorena Ruano, Akeza Awealom Asgedom, Bente Elisabeth Moen
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Ureteral procedures and complications
article

Assessment of infection prevention and control in public hospitals in the post war Tigray region of Ethiopia using the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF)

Ana Lorena Ruano, Akeza Awealom Asgedom, Bente Elisabeth Moen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strengthening infection prevention and control (IPC) is crucial for mitigating the risks of infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare facilities. The conflict in Tigray has had serious repercussions on the health system. This study aimed to assess the implementation of the IPC core components of (CC) public health facilities in post-war Tigray, Ethiopia, using the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC Assessment Framework (IPCAF) and hand hygiene self-assessment framework (HHSAF) standard tools. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted across 35 public health facilities comprising referral, general, and primary hospitals in Tigray state from June to July 2024. Data were collected by interviews of the IPC focal or managers at the accessible hospitals, using standardized WHO IPCAF and HHSAF tools. Descriptive statistics, including mean, median, interquartile range (IQR) and standard deviation, were utilized to summarize the data. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between IPCAF and HHSAF scores. An independent t-test was employed to compare mean IPCAF scores by type of healthcare facility. RESULTS: From a total of 35 eligible healthcare facilities invited, 33 participated in the survey, resulting in a 94% response rate. The mean age of respondents was 36 years (SD = 8), with an average of 10 service years (SD = 7). Most respondents were IPC focal persons (48.5%), followed by chief executive officers (27.3%). The median IPCAF score was 348 (IQR: 258-439), indicating a basic IPC level. Three facilities (9%) exhibited an inadequate IPC level, which means scores below 200. Twenty-one facilities (63.6%) demonstrated basic IPC levels, 8 facilities (24.2%) had intermediate IPC levels and only 1 facility (3%) achieved an advanced IPC level. A statistically significant positive correlation was identified between IPCAF and HHSAF scores (r = 0.765, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The levels of implementation of the WHO CC in post-war health facilities in Tigray were found to be unsatisfactory, with limitations evident across all zones and types of facilities. This situation increases the risk of healthcare-associated infections for healthcare personnel, patients, and visitors. A significant positive correlation was observed between IPCAF and HHSAF scores. Addressing the identified gaps through enhancements of IPC core components and capacity building is essential for preventing healthcare-associated infections. Longitudinal studies to monitor IPC implementations are recommended for ongoing assessment and improvement.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
University of Bergen (NO), Mekelle University (ET)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ureteral procedures and complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.