Global perspectives on leadership and change in higher education: A scoping review of empirical studies

Leadership plays a critical role in navigating institutional change in higher education, particularly in the context of global disruptions, policy shifts, and increasing demands for equity. While substantial scholarship has focused on senior executive leadership, the roles of deans and middle-level leaders in implementing and mediating institutional change remain comparatively underexplored. This scoping review synthesizes evidence from 24 empirical studies published between 2014 and 2024 across 22 countries. Guided by the frameworks of Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al., studies were identified through systematic searches in ERIC, Education Research Complete, and Academic Search Complete, and analysed using thematic synthesis. Institutional change initiatives most commonly involved crisis response, curriculum reform, policy restructuring, and digital transformation, with qualitative approaches predominating (n = 21). This review proposes a novel four-domain model of leadership strategies encompassing affective, strategic, structural, and ethical domains. Across the studies, deans and middle-level leaders emerged as pivotal actors who enacted distributed leadership, fostered stakeholder engagement, and mediated faculty resistance during reform implementation. Persistent challenges included faculty resistance, limited resources, and policy ambiguity. Faculty resistance and resource constraints were the most consistent barriers to sustainable reform, underscoring the importance of adaptive, collaborative, and ethically grounded leadership. This review advances a conceptual framework to inform leadership development and policy design in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Comparative and International Education
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999261444818
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global perspectives on leadership and change in higher education: A scoping review of empirical studies

Aloysius Nwabugo Maduforo, James Davis, Erika Eunice P. Salvador, Michele Jacobsen et al.
Research in Comparative and International Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Global perspectives on leadership and change in higher education: A scoping review of empirical studies

Aloysius Nwabugo Maduforo, James Davis, Erika Eunice P. Salvador, Michele Jacobsen, Sun Yan
article en

Abstract

Leadership plays a critical role in navigating institutional change in higher education, particularly in the context of global disruptions, policy shifts, and increasing demands for equity. While substantial scholarship has focused on senior executive leadership, the roles of deans and middle-level leaders in implementing and mediating institutional change remain comparatively underexplored. This scoping review synthesizes evidence from 24 empirical studies published between 2014 and 2024 across 22 countries. Guided by the frameworks of Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al., studies were identified through systematic searches in ERIC, Education Research Complete, and Academic Search Complete, and analysed using thematic synthesis. Institutional change initiatives most commonly involved crisis response, curriculum reform, policy restructuring, and digital transformation, with qualitative approaches predominating (n = 21). This review proposes a novel four-domain model of leadership strategies encompassing affective, strategic, structural, and ethical domains. Across the studies, deans and middle-level leaders emerged as pivotal actors who enacted distributed leadership, fostered stakeholder engagement, and mediated faculty resistance during reform implementation. Persistent challenges included faculty resistance, limited resources, and policy ambiguity. Faculty resistance and resource constraints were the most consistent barriers to sustainable reform, underscoring the importance of adaptive, collaborative, and ethically grounded leadership. This review advances a conceptual framework to inform leadership development and policy design in higher education.

Research in Comparative and International Education
Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Calgary (CA), Beijing Normal University (CN)
University of Calgary, Queensland University of Technology
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.