The Impact of Mind–Body Therapies on the Mental Health of Adults with Eating Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Eating disorders are among serious psychiatric conditions and are associated with an increased risk of mortality and significant psychological distress. Mind–body therapies are attracting increasing attention as complementary interventions aimed at improving psychological well-being. The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the effects of mind–body therapies on psychological outcomes in adults diagnosed with an eating disorder or exhibiting clinically significant symptoms associated with it. Methods: Randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2026 were identified through a systematic search of the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Studies were included that involved participants aged 18 years and over who had received a diagnosis of an eating disorder according to standard diagnostic criteria (e.g., DSM-IV, DSM-IV-TR, DSM-5) or who exhibited clinically significant symptoms associated with an eating disorder. Mind–body interventions were compared with control conditions. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute assessment tool. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 16.0 software. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials involving a total of 688 participants were included in the meta-analysis. It was found that mind–body interventions significantly reduced levels of depression (Hedges’ g = −0.44, 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.20). Similarly, significant reductions were observed in levels of inadequate self (g = −0.51, 95% CI: −0.84 to −0.18) and self-hated (g = −0.56, 95% CI: −0.89 to −0.23). Although an effect in the direction of an increase was observed for self-compassion (g = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.07–0.54), this effect was not found to be statistically significant following the correction applied for multiple comparisons. In contrast, anxiety (g = −0.19, 95% CI: −0.39 to 0.02), stress (g = −0.48, 95% CI: −1.05 to 0.09), and self-esteem (g = 0.29, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.73). Conclusions: Mind–body therapies are associated with improvements in certain psychological outcomes among adults with a diagnosis of an eating disorder or those exhibiting clinically significant symptoms. However, the current findings should be interpreted with caution, as the included studies largely relied on waiting-list or usual-care control groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmms13020010
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Mind–Body Therapies on the Mental Health of Adults with Eating Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

Gülgün Durat, Sevgi Koroglu
Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

The Impact of Mind–Body Therapies on the Mental Health of Adults with Eating Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

Gülgün Durat, Sevgi Koroglu
article en

Abstract

Background: Eating disorders are among serious psychiatric conditions and are associated with an increased risk of mortality and significant psychological distress. Mind–body therapies are attracting increasing attention as complementary interventions aimed at improving psychological well-being. The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the effects of mind–body therapies on psychological outcomes in adults diagnosed with an eating disorder or exhibiting clinically significant symptoms associated with it. Methods: Randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2026 were identified through a systematic search of the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Studies were included that involved participants aged 18 years and over who had received a diagnosis of an eating disorder according to standard diagnostic criteria (e.g., DSM-IV, DSM-IV-TR, DSM-5) or who exhibited clinically significant symptoms associated with an eating disorder. Mind–body interventions were compared with control conditions. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute assessment tool. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 16.0 software. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials involving a total of 688 participants were included in the meta-analysis. It was found that mind–body interventions significantly reduced levels of depression (Hedges’ g = −0.44, 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.20). Similarly, significant reductions were observed in levels of inadequate self (g = −0.51, 95% CI: −0.84 to −0.18) and self-hated (g = −0.56, 95% CI: −0.89 to −0.23). Although an effect in the direction of an increase was observed for self-compassion (g = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.07–0.54), this effect was not found to be statistically significant following the correction applied for multiple comparisons. In contrast, anxiety (g = −0.19, 95% CI: −0.39 to 0.02), stress (g = −0.48, 95% CI: −1.05 to 0.09), and self-esteem (g = 0.29, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.73). Conclusions: Mind–body therapies are associated with improvements in certain psychological outcomes among adults with a diagnosis of an eating disorder or those exhibiting clinically significant symptoms. However, the current findings should be interpreted with caution, as the included studies largely relied on waiting-list or usual-care control groups.

Journal of Mind and Medical SciencesVol. 13(2)
Sakarya University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.