Mapping the landscape of managed entry agreements: a systematic review of global frameworks, system-level components, and implementation challenges
Background: Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) are pivotal for enabling access to innovative pharmaceuticals while mitigating financial risk and addressing evidence uncertainty. Despite conceptual acceptance, the essential requirements for their design and implementation are poorly documented, posing a challenge for evolving health systems. This study aimed to systematically review and map global evidence published in the literature on the existence and characterization of countries' MEA policies, focusing on the core system-level components, governance, and operational frameworks for successful implementation, and their associated development and implementation challenges. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2025. Studies discussing governance, frameworks, legislation, or implementation of pharmaceutical MEAs were included. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively. Results: Of 96 included studies, most focused on European (43%) and North American (28%) systems, with a significant evidence gap for the Middle East and low-income countries. While situational analysis was the most common theme (63%), the literature predominantly catalogued barriers rather than providing operational solutions. Key barriers were inefficient regulatory frameworks (identified in 42% of studies), data infrastructure limitations (41%), and high administrative burden (38%). Stakeholder analysis highlighted underrepresentation of academia and civil society. A minority of studies (15%) focused on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs). Conclusion: This review identifies a critical "how-to" gap in the MEA literature. While the value of MEAs is acknowledged, there is a stark deficit of actionable, system-level guidance on the regulatory, governance, and operational prerequisites for implementation. For health systems seeking to adopt MEAs, future efforts must shift from describing barriers to developing concrete implementation toolkits, legislative roadmaps, and fit-for-purpose payment models.
Authors
- Rosanna Tarricone (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-9357)
- Mansoor Ahmed Khan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3702-3754)
- Laila Carolina Abu Esba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2459-1485)
- Panos G. Kanavos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-3089)
- Amal Hassan Al-Najjar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-1177)
- Fatma Maraiki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6875-1095)
- Consuela Cheriece Yousef (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-7582)
- Hussain Abdulrahman Al‐Omar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-0466)
- Hind Almodaimegh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7620-6054)
- Jehan Alamre
- Lolwa Hamad Almudaiyan
- Sultan Tawfiq AlShurbaji
- Khalid AlYahya
- Esraa S. Altawil
- Abdualmajeed Saad Binjumayah
- Faisal Awwadh Alharbi
- Asma Abdulaziz Almuhsin
- Jaime Espín
Institutions
- Department of Health and Social Care (GB)
- Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA)
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA)
- King Saud Medical City (SA)
- Ministero della Salute (IT)
- King Saud University (SA)
- King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA)
- Directorate of Health (IS)
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA)
- New York Life Insurance Company (United States) (US)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES)
- National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
- University of York (GB)
- Andalusian School of Public Health (ES)
- Bocconi University (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Published
- 2026-04-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1803870
- Primary Topic
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00