Evaluating the utility of socio-economic indicators to assess the resilience of smallholder agriculture to drought in Africa

Abstract Drought is a recurrent natural hazard that significantly impacts on the livelihoods and sustainability of smallholder agriculture in Africa. A wide range of indicators have been reported in the scientific literature to support assessments of drought at multiple scales (local, regional, national) and from different perspectives, including their physical, environmental, agronomic and socio-economic (SEVI) impacts. In this study, an approach similar to a systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the range of indicators used to assess drought impacts in agriculture, with a specific focus on those that inform SEVI assessments of farmer capacities to build future resilience to drought. Based on an analysis of 355 articles from the scientific and grey literature, the majority (86%) of drought-related indicator articles were published in the last decade, with half (51%) focused on Africa and Asia. In Africa most studies were targeted at South Africa, Ethiopia and Kenya. Regarding the types of indicators used, over a quarter (27%) of studies relied on SEVI indicators with meteorological (20%), composite (19%), hydrological (12%), agricultural (8%), remote sensing (8%) and environmental (4%) indicators also being used. Most (50%) drought impact studies were conducted at the regional level, with a fifth (21%) at national and 15% at local scales, respectively. Within the literature that adopted SEVI assessments of drought, 35 different indicator types were reported. These specifically focused on vulnerability, drought resilience, coping strategies and other aspects involving indigenous knowledge, gender, risk-based and perception-based indicators, as well as various SEVI metrics. The research also identified the challenges associated with using indicators to assess drought resilience, and to support resilience frameworks, and areas for future research to inform policies to support drought risk management and sustainable agricultural development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae6238
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the utility of socio-economic indicators to assess the resilience of smallholder agriculture to drought in Africa

Chris Dickens, Tim Hess, Radheeka Jirasinha, Jeremy Knox et al.
Environmental Research Communications
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Evaluating the utility of socio-economic indicators to assess the resilience of smallholder agriculture to drought in Africa

Chris Dickens, Tim Hess, Radheeka Jirasinha, Jeremy Knox, Niranjan Panigrahi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Drought is a recurrent natural hazard that significantly impacts on the livelihoods and sustainability of smallholder agriculture in Africa. A wide range of indicators have been reported in the scientific literature to support assessments of drought at multiple scales (local, regional, national) and from different perspectives, including their physical, environmental, agronomic and socio-economic (SEVI) impacts. In this study, an approach similar to a systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the range of indicators used to assess drought impacts in agriculture, with a specific focus on those that inform SEVI assessments of farmer capacities to build future resilience to drought. Based on an analysis of 355 articles from the scientific and grey literature, the majority (86%) of drought-related indicator articles were published in the last decade, with half (51%) focused on Africa and Asia. In Africa most studies were targeted at South Africa, Ethiopia and Kenya. Regarding the types of indicators used, over a quarter (27%) of studies relied on SEVI indicators with meteorological (20%), composite (19%), hydrological (12%), agricultural (8%), remote sensing (8%) and environmental (4%) indicators also being used. Most (50%) drought impact studies were conducted at the regional level, with a fifth (21%) at national and 15% at local scales, respectively. Within the literature that adopted SEVI assessments of drought, 35 different indicator types were reported. These specifically focused on vulnerability, drought resilience, coping strategies and other aspects involving indigenous knowledge, gender, risk-based and perception-based indicators, as well as various SEVI metrics. The research also identified the challenges associated with using indicators to assess drought resilience, and to support resilience frameworks, and areas for future research to inform policies to support drought risk management and sustainable agricultural development.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 8(5)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.