Comparative Performance of Machine Learning Models and Logistic Regression for Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Prediction in the COVID-19 Vaccination Era: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction The integration of Artificial Intelligence in healthcare systems offers transformative potential for enhancing healthcare administration and improving insurance risk modeling through more accurate patient stratification. This study evaluates the predictive performance of support vector machines (SVM), gradient boosting (GBM), and random forest (RF) against multivariate logistic regression for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) risk stratification, focusing on its implications for healthcare administration and insurance modeling. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on 901 patients at Alexandra Hospital of Athens (January 2021 to December 2023). Inclusion was restricted to first-incident AMI cases, verified through clinical and digital registries; patients with a prior history of AMI were strictly excluded. Predictor variables included standardized clinical data, lifestyle factors, and COVID-19 vaccination status, all verified prior to the AMI event. Models were trained and validated using a 70/30 hold-out split (n=631 training; n=270 testing), a strategy selected to provide a stable testing set for benchmark comparison. Performance was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) to assess how predictive precision can enhance organizational risk assessment and resource allocation. Results Among the predictive models, SVM achieved the highest overall accuracy (62.08%), while GBM demonstrated a modest discriminative capacity with an AUC of 0.63 and a sensitivity of 0.76. Crucially, within this specific clinical cohort, COVID-19 vaccination status showed no statistically significant association with AMI risk (OR 1.12, p=0.41). These results represent an exploratory comparison of algorithmic performance for risk prediction rather than a finalized tool for robust clinical stratification. Conclusion While the accuracy gain over logistic regression is incremental, SVM and GBM models provide a more refined classification for high-risk cohorts. These findings suggest that AI-based stratification can optimize risk management frameworks and actuarial modeling, effectively bridging clinical cardiology with insurance science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.107396
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance of Machine Learning Models and Logistic Regression for Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Prediction in the COVID-19 Vaccination Era: A Retrospective Observational Study

Vasileios Georgakis, Panos Xenos
Cureus
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Comparative Performance of Machine Learning Models and Logistic Regression for Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Prediction in the COVID-19 Vaccination Era: A Retrospective Observational Study

Vasileios Georgakis, Panos Xenos
article en

Abstract

Introduction The integration of Artificial Intelligence in healthcare systems offers transformative potential for enhancing healthcare administration and improving insurance risk modeling through more accurate patient stratification. This study evaluates the predictive performance of support vector machines (SVM), gradient boosting (GBM), and random forest (RF) against multivariate logistic regression for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) risk stratification, focusing on its implications for healthcare administration and insurance modeling. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on 901 patients at Alexandra Hospital of Athens (January 2021 to December 2023). Inclusion was restricted to first-incident AMI cases, verified through clinical and digital registries; patients with a prior history of AMI were strictly excluded. Predictor variables included standardized clinical data, lifestyle factors, and COVID-19 vaccination status, all verified prior to the AMI event. Models were trained and validated using a 70/30 hold-out split (n=631 training; n=270 testing), a strategy selected to provide a stable testing set for benchmark comparison. Performance was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) to assess how predictive precision can enhance organizational risk assessment and resource allocation. Results Among the predictive models, SVM achieved the highest overall accuracy (62.08%), while GBM demonstrated a modest discriminative capacity with an AUC of 0.63 and a sensitivity of 0.76. Crucially, within this specific clinical cohort, COVID-19 vaccination status showed no statistically significant association with AMI risk (OR 1.12, p=0.41). These results represent an exploratory comparison of algorithmic performance for risk prediction rather than a finalized tool for robust clinical stratification. Conclusion While the accuracy gain over logistic regression is incremental, SVM and GBM models provide a more refined classification for high-risk cohorts. These findings suggest that AI-based stratification can optimize risk management frameworks and actuarial modeling, effectively bridging clinical cardiology with insurance science.

Cureus
University of Piraeus (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.