Multimodal prehabilitation for frail older adults having hip or knee replacement: a qualitative exploratory study of barriers and facilitators

Frailty is common in patients undergoing joint replacement, with approximately 20–25% of patients having moderate-severe frailty. In an orthopaedic context, frailty is associated with increased mortality, longer hospital stays, post-operative complications, more hospital admissions, and worse pain and function after surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation may improve outcomes for frail patients undergoing joint replacement, however evaluation of the effectiveness of this approach is needed. Prior to conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT), a feasibility study can address key uncertainties and explore how to optimise trial design and delivery. The aim of this qualitative study embedded within a randomised feasibility study was to gain an understanding of the experiences of older frail patients waiting for a total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) participating in a multimodal prehabilitation programme, and to seek insight into the barriers and facilitators influencing adherence. This was a qualitative study embedded within a randomised feasibility study of a 12-week daily home-based prehabilitation programme (exercise and protein supplements) for frail patients aged ≥ 65 years on the waiting list for primary THR or TKR. Participants in the feasibility study were invited to participate in a semi-structured qualitative interview. Interview questions were informed by a topic guide, and an inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts was conducted. Interviews were conducted with 10 participants randomised to the intervention group. Three overarching themes that influenced adherence to the prehabilitation programme were identified. Intervention design factors included the intervention appointment and telephone support, provision and clarity of written information and tailoring of the exercise programme. Internal factors included pain, general health and wellbeing, and personal motivations and perceived value. Environmental/external influences included social influences and daily life (integration, interruption and changes to usual routine). This qualitative study identified multifactorial barriers and facilitators that influence frail older adults’ adherence to multimodal prehabilitation before joint replacement. Our findings also highlight the importance of provision of tailored prehabilitation and additional support and resources to optimise accessibility and adherence. ISRCTN11121506, registered 29 September 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09803-z
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal prehabilitation for frail older adults having hip or knee replacement: a qualitative exploratory study of barriers and facilitators

M. A. Jepson, Vikki Wylde, Emma Johnson
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Multimodal prehabilitation for frail older adults having hip or knee replacement: a qualitative exploratory study of barriers and facilitators

M. A. Jepson, Vikki Wylde, Emma Johnson
article en

Abstract

Frailty is common in patients undergoing joint replacement, with approximately 20–25% of patients having moderate-severe frailty. In an orthopaedic context, frailty is associated with increased mortality, longer hospital stays, post-operative complications, more hospital admissions, and worse pain and function after surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation may improve outcomes for frail patients undergoing joint replacement, however evaluation of the effectiveness of this approach is needed. Prior to conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT), a feasibility study can address key uncertainties and explore how to optimise trial design and delivery. The aim of this qualitative study embedded within a randomised feasibility study was to gain an understanding of the experiences of older frail patients waiting for a total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) participating in a multimodal prehabilitation programme, and to seek insight into the barriers and facilitators influencing adherence. This was a qualitative study embedded within a randomised feasibility study of a 12-week daily home-based prehabilitation programme (exercise and protein supplements) for frail patients aged ≥ 65 years on the waiting list for primary THR or TKR. Participants in the feasibility study were invited to participate in a semi-structured qualitative interview. Interview questions were informed by a topic guide, and an inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts was conducted. Interviews were conducted with 10 participants randomised to the intervention group. Three overarching themes that influenced adherence to the prehabilitation programme were identified. Intervention design factors included the intervention appointment and telephone support, provision and clarity of written information and tailoring of the exercise programme. Internal factors included pain, general health and wellbeing, and personal motivations and perceived value. Environmental/external influences included social influences and daily life (integration, interruption and changes to usual routine). This qualitative study identified multifactorial barriers and facilitators that influence frail older adults’ adherence to multimodal prehabilitation before joint replacement. Our findings also highlight the importance of provision of tailored prehabilitation and additional support and resources to optimise accessibility and adherence. ISRCTN11121506, registered 29 September 2022.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), At Bristol (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.