The role of misinformation in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in low- & middle-income countries

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, timely vaccination was crucial in acquiring herd immunity. While high-income countries typically had better access to vaccines, interventions were implemented to improve accessibility for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Vaccine uptake presented major barriers to achieving herd immunity globally and was more significant in LMICs. Vaccine hesitancy was amplified by misinformation, including but not limited to social media misinformation. This scoping review aims to: (1) explore the role of misinformation in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in LMICs and (2) identify primary sources, key themes, and dissemination channels of this misinformation, encompassing all relevant sources but with an emphasis on social media, given the infodemic context which proved to be particularly significant during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were searched using predefined search terms. All identified articles underwent a rigorous screening process, and if eligible, proceeded to data extraction. RESULTS: In total, 119 studies were included in this review. Primary dissemination platforms included Facebook, WhatsApp, X, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, Pinterest, LinkedIn, and Zalo. Key themes of misinformation identified included (1) malicious intent, (2) fear of side effects, (3) concerns about vaccine development and safety, (4) religious and cultural beliefs, and (5) natural immunity. CONCLUSION: Overall, this scoping review addresses the literature gap in the role of misinformation pertaining to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and suggests investing in misinformation-mitigation interventions to reduce public harms and disruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128595
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of misinformation in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in low- & middle-income countries

Bara’ Abdallah AlShurman, Dipika Shankar Bhattacharyya, Aditi Majoe, Mariam Hassan et al.
Vaccine
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

The role of misinformation in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in low- & middle-income countries

Bara’ Abdallah AlShurman, Dipika Shankar Bhattacharyya, Aditi Majoe, Mariam Hassan, Thenugaa Rajeswaran, Joy Zeng, Labiqah Iftikhar, Zahid Ahmad Butt, Daliana Lobo Torres, Naumana Basharat, Lakshna Ponrajah, Jasleen Kaur, Ziyad Uddin Khan, Nuzhat Namiha, Aryan Yogesh Sarnaik, Zaara Kastura
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, timely vaccination was crucial in acquiring herd immunity. While high-income countries typically had better access to vaccines, interventions were implemented to improve accessibility for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Vaccine uptake presented major barriers to achieving herd immunity globally and was more significant in LMICs. Vaccine hesitancy was amplified by misinformation, including but not limited to social media misinformation. This scoping review aims to: (1) explore the role of misinformation in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in LMICs and (2) identify primary sources, key themes, and dissemination channels of this misinformation, encompassing all relevant sources but with an emphasis on social media, given the infodemic context which proved to be particularly significant during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were searched using predefined search terms. All identified articles underwent a rigorous screening process, and if eligible, proceeded to data extraction. RESULTS: In total, 119 studies were included in this review. Primary dissemination platforms included Facebook, WhatsApp, X, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, Pinterest, LinkedIn, and Zalo. Key themes of misinformation identified included (1) malicious intent, (2) fear of side effects, (3) concerns about vaccine development and safety, (4) religious and cultural beliefs, and (5) natural immunity. CONCLUSION: Overall, this scoping review addresses the literature gap in the role of misinformation pertaining to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and suggests investing in misinformation-mitigation interventions to reduce public harms and disruptions.

VaccineVol. 82
University of Waterloo (CA), Regional Municipality of Waterloo (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA), National Research Council Canada (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.