Moving for relief: a meta-analysis on traditional Chinese exercise and nonspecific low back pain

Objective: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Exercise in reducing pain intensity, improving dysfunction and quality of life, and increasing the overall treatment effectiveness rate in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP), so as to provide evidence for its clinical application. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study systematically searched eight databases-CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Sinomed, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science-for randomized controlled trials published up to January 19, 2026. A total of 38 studies involving, 3,054 patients were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Based on heterogeneity, either a fixed-effects or random-effects model was selected to synthesize the standardized mean difference (SMD) or weighted mean difference (WMD), Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Results: The meta-analysis demonstrated that traditional Chinese exercise significantly reduced pain intensity [WMD = -1.21; 95% CI (-1.66, -0.76)], improved dysfunction [WMD = -6.80; 95% CI (-10.18, -3.41)], and enhanced quality of life [SMD = 1.64; 95% CI (0.33, 2.96)] in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP). The overall treatment response rate was increased by 17% [RR = 1.17; 95% CI (1.10, 1.24)]. Subgroup analysis indicated that Liu Zi Jue (a specific Qigong breathing exercise) demonstrated the greatest analgesic effect (SMD = -1.71) and the most significant improvement in functional disability (WMD = -13.35). Additionally, patients younger than 45 years of age showed a more favorable response to treatment (SMD = -1.52). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies, attributed primarily to the diversity of intervention protocols, including variations in exercise types, treatment durations, and differences in the measurement instruments used. Conclusion: Traditional Chinese exercise is an effective, low-cost, and safe intervention for NLBP patients and may be recommended as a complementary approach in clinical management. Future research should include large-sample, standardized studies incorporating biomechanical and imaging techniques to elucidate underlying mechanisms, and develop evidence-based practice guidelines. Systematic Review Registration: identifier: CRD42025649466 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pain Research
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2026.1729225
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving for relief: a meta-analysis on traditional Chinese exercise and nonspecific low back pain

Jia-Jia Sang, Yingfei Bai, Xingquan Zhai, Qianqian Zhang et al.
Frontiers in Pain Research
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Moving for relief: a meta-analysis on traditional Chinese exercise and nonspecific low back pain

Jia-Jia Sang, Yingfei Bai, Xingquan Zhai, Qianqian Zhang, Xi Zhang, Hui Ye, Jiaxin Xi, Zixiang Jin, Meng Wang
article en

Abstract

Objective: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Exercise in reducing pain intensity, improving dysfunction and quality of life, and increasing the overall treatment effectiveness rate in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP), so as to provide evidence for its clinical application. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study systematically searched eight databases-CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Sinomed, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science-for randomized controlled trials published up to January 19, 2026. A total of 38 studies involving, 3,054 patients were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Based on heterogeneity, either a fixed-effects or random-effects model was selected to synthesize the standardized mean difference (SMD) or weighted mean difference (WMD), Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Results: The meta-analysis demonstrated that traditional Chinese exercise significantly reduced pain intensity [WMD = -1.21; 95% CI (-1.66, -0.76)], improved dysfunction [WMD = -6.80; 95% CI (-10.18, -3.41)], and enhanced quality of life [SMD = 1.64; 95% CI (0.33, 2.96)] in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP). The overall treatment response rate was increased by 17% [RR = 1.17; 95% CI (1.10, 1.24)]. Subgroup analysis indicated that Liu Zi Jue (a specific Qigong breathing exercise) demonstrated the greatest analgesic effect (SMD = -1.71) and the most significant improvement in functional disability (WMD = -13.35). Additionally, patients younger than 45 years of age showed a more favorable response to treatment (SMD = -1.52). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies, attributed primarily to the diversity of intervention protocols, including variations in exercise types, treatment durations, and differences in the measurement instruments used. Conclusion: Traditional Chinese exercise is an effective, low-cost, and safe intervention for NLBP patients and may be recommended as a complementary approach in clinical management. Future research should include large-sample, standardized studies incorporating biomechanical and imaging techniques to elucidate underlying mechanisms, and develop evidence-based practice guidelines. Systematic Review Registration: identifier: CRD42025649466 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).

Frontiers in Pain ResearchVol. 7
Xinjiang Medical University (CN), Peking University (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN), China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN), Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.