Low-dose versus standard-dose antivenom for neuroparalytic krait envenomation: a randomized pilot study

INTRODUCTION: ) is a leading cause of neuroparalytic snake envenomation in South Asia. Current guidelines recommend escalation from 10 to 20 vials of polyvalent antivenom if neurotoxicity persists, despite limited evidence supporting this strategy. METHODS: This open-label, randomized pilot study was conducted in North India, enrolling patients with krait envenomation who presented with neurotoxic paralysis but without respiratory failure. Patients were assigned to receive either 10 vials or 20 vials of polyvalent antivenom. The primary outcome was time to recovery from neurotoxic paralysis. Secondary outcomes included the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, time from enrolment to intubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: = 0.38). Invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 34.6% of patients in the 10-vial group and 22.2% in the 20-vial group (risk ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.77 to 2.31). Among ventilated patients, the median time to intubation and duration of mechanical ventilation were similar between groups. One death occurred in the 10-vial group. DISCUSSION: Routine escalation of antivenom dosing may not be necessary in krait neurotoxicity with close respiratory monitoring and supportive care. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with neuroparalytic krait envenomation who presented without respiratory failure, a 10-vial antivenom regimen was associated with clinical outcomes comparable to those with a 20-vial regimen.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Toxicology
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2026.2655938
Primary Topic
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-dose versus standard-dose antivenom for neuroparalytic krait envenomation: a randomized pilot study

Ashok Kumar Pannu, Prannoy George Mathen, Navneet Sharma, R. R. Sharma et al.
Clinical Toxicology
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
article

Low-dose versus standard-dose antivenom for neuroparalytic krait envenomation: a randomized pilot study

Ashok Kumar Pannu, Prannoy George Mathen, Navneet Sharma, R. R. Sharma, Neeraj Singla, Siva Jyothika
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: ) is a leading cause of neuroparalytic snake envenomation in South Asia. Current guidelines recommend escalation from 10 to 20 vials of polyvalent antivenom if neurotoxicity persists, despite limited evidence supporting this strategy. METHODS: This open-label, randomized pilot study was conducted in North India, enrolling patients with krait envenomation who presented with neurotoxic paralysis but without respiratory failure. Patients were assigned to receive either 10 vials or 20 vials of polyvalent antivenom. The primary outcome was time to recovery from neurotoxic paralysis. Secondary outcomes included the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, time from enrolment to intubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: = 0.38). Invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 34.6% of patients in the 10-vial group and 22.2% in the 20-vial group (risk ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.77 to 2.31). Among ventilated patients, the median time to intubation and duration of mechanical ventilation were similar between groups. One death occurred in the 10-vial group. DISCUSSION: Routine escalation of antivenom dosing may not be necessary in krait neurotoxicity with close respiratory monitoring and supportive care. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with neuroparalytic krait envenomation who presented without respiratory failure, a 10-vial antivenom regimen was associated with clinical outcomes comparable to those with a 20-vial regimen.

Clinical Toxicology
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.