Correction: From L2 acquisition to L1 restructuring: phonotactics in perception and production

There was a mistake in Table 1 Adding/removing text Due to a production error, there were issues in phonetic and phonological transcription in following sections.Frontiers Media SA PAGE \* Arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 3A correction has been made to section 3, section 6.2.1, section 8. with order counterbalanced across participants (see "Stimuli motivation" for rationale).Section 8.7 Of 900 items (600 BP, 300 English), 24 (2.67%) were excluded due to recording errors (n = 2), consonant or syllable epenthesis (n = 3; e.g., /map.ta/-[ˈma.pi.tʃi.tɐ], /map.ka/-[ˈmapt.kɐ], syllable metathesis (n = 9; e.g., /map.ta/-[ˈta.map], unnatural pauses (n = 5), or uncategorizable productions (n = 5; e.g., /mat.ka/-[ma.pɐ])…. …The final dataset comprised 876 items: 584 in BP (296 with initial stress, 288 with final stress) and 292 in English.Section 10.3.2 In L1 BP acquisition, certain lexemes will be stored with epenthetic /i/ (e.g., obter "to obtain" → /o.bi.ˈteɾ/ → |obiteɾ|. This entrenched representation remains largely unchanged despite L2 English exposure, meaning an underlying form such as |obiteɾ| consistently maps to /o.bi.ˈteɾ/ in phonological production, ….The original version of this article has been updated.