Quality and Accuracy Assessment of <scp>YouTube</scp> Videos on Vital Pulp Therapy

The aim was to assess the quality and accuracy of Vital Pulp Therapy videos on YouTube. First, sixty videos were surfed using five (pulp capping, pulpotomy, vital pulp therapy, and two layman terms) keywords. Quality was assessed using the following validated indices: Modified DISCERN, Global Quality Score (GQS), and Video Information and Quality index (VIQI). Accuracy was evaluated using scoring criteria based on European Society of Endodontology (ESE) and American Association of Endodontists (AAE) position statements. The correlation between the derived metrics was established using Spearman's rank order. The average quality scores were 3.03 (modified DISCERN), 3.1 (GQS), and 11.08 (VIQI). As per the ESE statement, the average accuracy was 44.64%, 25.87%, and 32.8%, respectively, for 'pulpotomy', 'pulp capping', and 'vital pulp therapy' videos. Mean accuracy as per the AAE statement was 24.63%. A positive correlation of accuracy was established with all the metrics derived. The overall quality and accuracy were subpar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.70085
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality and Accuracy Assessment of YouTube Videos on Vital Pulp Therapy

Prashant Bhasin, Divya Nangia, Hemanshi Kumar, Ashima Garg et al.
Australian Endodontic Journal
Dental Research and COVID-19
article

Quality and Accuracy Assessment of YouTube Videos on Vital Pulp Therapy

Prashant Bhasin, Divya Nangia, Hemanshi Kumar, Ashima Garg, Dr.Vasudev Ballal, Meenu G. Singla, Esha Sukhala
article en

Abstract

The aim was to assess the quality and accuracy of Vital Pulp Therapy videos on YouTube. First, sixty videos were surfed using five (pulp capping, pulpotomy, vital pulp therapy, and two layman terms) keywords. Quality was assessed using the following validated indices: Modified DISCERN, Global Quality Score (GQS), and Video Information and Quality index (VIQI). Accuracy was evaluated using scoring criteria based on European Society of Endodontology (ESE) and American Association of Endodontists (AAE) position statements. The correlation between the derived metrics was established using Spearman's rank order. The average quality scores were 3.03 (modified DISCERN), 3.1 (GQS), and 11.08 (VIQI). As per the ESE statement, the average accuracy was 44.64%, 25.87%, and 32.8%, respectively, for 'pulpotomy', 'pulp capping', and 'vital pulp therapy' videos. Mean accuracy as per the AAE statement was 24.63%. A positive correlation of accuracy was established with all the metrics derived. The overall quality and accuracy were subpar.

Australian Endodontic Journal
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), ESIC Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental Research and COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.