Dynamic Behavior of Cross Tunnels in Sandy Soils of Different Relative Densities

Cross-tunnel behavior under dynamic loadings is essential for practical design. A complex response of vertically stacked cross tunnels in a soil medium is examined in the present article. The analysis involves sandy soil of different relative densities for a soil–tunnel system under dynamic loading conditions. This work examines the impact of tunnel lining thickness, flexibility ratio, cross-tunnel pillar depth, soil relative density, and variation in the amplitude of input motion on the dynamic behavior of cross tunnels. Harmonic waves are used to analyze five different parameters that define the behavior of cross tunnels in sandy soil. The results of the analyzed responses indicate that relatively rigid cross tunnels are preferable in most cases, particularly when the second tunnel is located below the first one. The results show a drastic variation of 45% in the surface amplification ratio between single and cross tunnels in loose sand and a maximum horizontal convergence of 1.7% of tunnel radius for relatively flexible cross tunnels in dense sand. Cross tunnels at shallow depths experience a 62.9% increase in settlement compared with single tunnels in dense sand. Moreover, Type 1 relatively flexible cross tunnels experience a 15% higher dynamic bending moment than the single tunnel case. A drastic jump of 25.7% is observed in axial thrust values for relatively rigid cross tunnels, even though the thrust magnitude is lower. For residual earth pressure, Type 2 relatively flexible cross tunnels are preferable for dynamic events. It is also found that a direct correlation between dynamic surface displacement or any other soil–tunnel response parameter and the flexibility ratio of the tunnel can be misleading, unless the changing variables of flexibility ratio formulation are known. This investigation shows some of the critical combinations of cross tunnels required for the dynamic design of tunnel networks in regions with sandy soil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-12617
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Behavior of Cross Tunnels in Sandy Soils of Different Relative Densities

Rishav Baishya, Deepankar Choudhury
International Journal of Geomechanics
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Dynamic Behavior of Cross Tunnels in Sandy Soils of Different Relative Densities

Rishav Baishya, Deepankar Choudhury
article en

Abstract

Cross-tunnel behavior under dynamic loadings is essential for practical design. A complex response of vertically stacked cross tunnels in a soil medium is examined in the present article. The analysis involves sandy soil of different relative densities for a soil–tunnel system under dynamic loading conditions. This work examines the impact of tunnel lining thickness, flexibility ratio, cross-tunnel pillar depth, soil relative density, and variation in the amplitude of input motion on the dynamic behavior of cross tunnels. Harmonic waves are used to analyze five different parameters that define the behavior of cross tunnels in sandy soil. The results of the analyzed responses indicate that relatively rigid cross tunnels are preferable in most cases, particularly when the second tunnel is located below the first one. The results show a drastic variation of 45% in the surface amplification ratio between single and cross tunnels in loose sand and a maximum horizontal convergence of 1.7% of tunnel radius for relatively flexible cross tunnels in dense sand. Cross tunnels at shallow depths experience a 62.9% increase in settlement compared with single tunnels in dense sand. Moreover, Type 1 relatively flexible cross tunnels experience a 15% higher dynamic bending moment than the single tunnel case. A drastic jump of 25.7% is observed in axial thrust values for relatively rigid cross tunnels, even though the thrust magnitude is lower. For residual earth pressure, Type 2 relatively flexible cross tunnels are preferable for dynamic events. It is also found that a direct correlation between dynamic surface displacement or any other soil–tunnel response parameter and the flexibility ratio of the tunnel can be misleading, unless the changing variables of flexibility ratio formulation are known. This investigation shows some of the critical combinations of cross tunnels required for the dynamic design of tunnel networks in regions with sandy soil.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 26(7)
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.