Missing the human in AI: on dehumanisation by generative AI chatbots using the case of Replika

Large Language Model (LLM) based chatbots are increasingly prominent in the digital landscape, promising users a range of experiences, everything from human-like conversation to intimate companionship. But where exactly is the human in such technology? And what is its impact on the humanity of those persons engaging with it? Taking as its focus the popular LLM-based chatbot Replika, this article contends that - positive use cases notwithstanding - emerging generative AI technology carries with it a novel and more subtle form of dehumanisation. We combine an autoethnographic investigation with a multi-disciplinary critique (human-computer interaction; moral philosophy; law) to argue that such technology risks dehumanisation by inviting, demanding or conditioning human emotional and attentional engagement in circumstances where reciprocity is structurally impossible. We argue further that existing conceptual, philosophical and regulatory systems will need to be adapted to help diminish or erase the risks and harms presented by these emerging technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics and Information Technology
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-026-09898-x
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Missing the human in AI: on dehumanisation by generative AI chatbots using the case of Replika

Christiane Grünloh, Paolo Monti, Michelle Worthington
Ethics and Information Technology
AI in Service Interactions
article

Missing the human in AI: on dehumanisation by generative AI chatbots using the case of Replika

Christiane Grünloh, Paolo Monti, Michelle Worthington
article en

Abstract

Large Language Model (LLM) based chatbots are increasingly prominent in the digital landscape, promising users a range of experiences, everything from human-like conversation to intimate companionship. But where exactly is the human in such technology? And what is its impact on the humanity of those persons engaging with it? Taking as its focus the popular LLM-based chatbot Replika, this article contends that - positive use cases notwithstanding - emerging generative AI technology carries with it a novel and more subtle form of dehumanisation. We combine an autoethnographic investigation with a multi-disciplinary critique (human-computer interaction; moral philosophy; law) to argue that such technology risks dehumanisation by inviting, demanding or conditioning human emotional and attentional engagement in circumstances where reciprocity is structurally impossible. We argue further that existing conceptual, philosophical and regulatory systems will need to be adapted to help diminish or erase the risks and harms presented by these emerging technologies.

Ethics and Information TechnologyVol. 28(2)
Australian National University (AU), Roessingh Research and Development (NL), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.