Multidimensional well being and socioeconomic inequality among middle aged and older adults in Jiangsu and Gansu China

This study uses data from the 2020 wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study to examine multidimensional well being among adults aged 45 years and above in Jiangsu and Gansu, two provinces with distinct development profiles. The index draws on twelve indicators covering education and cognition, lifestyle risk, health status, economic support, and social security. Equal weights are assigned across dimensions, while entropy weights are used for the indicators within each dimension. Missing values are imputed using Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations, and the estimates are pooled across the imputed datasets using Rubin’s rules. Socioeconomic inequality is assessed with the Slope Index of Inequality and the Relative Index of Inequality based on household consumption rankings. Although the two provinces record very similar overall composite scores, the pattern beneath those scores differs. Jiangsu shows a clearer advantage in health status, while Gansu displays a modest relative strength in economic support and social security coverage. The most pronounced socioeconomic gradient appears in education and cognition. The lifestyle dimension moves in the opposite direction, especially in Gansu, where lifestyle related risk is relatively higher among groups with higher household consumption. Under the baseline specification, women show slightly higher composite scores than men, though this difference becomes less stable once the dimensional specification is changed. What matters here is not simply that the provincial averages are close, but that the underlying composition of well being and its distribution across groups are not the same. Looking across dimensions makes these differences easier to see and helps identify where inequality is most concentrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-01925-y
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidimensional well being and socioeconomic inequality among middle aged and older adults in Jiangsu and Gansu China

Sharifah Shafinaz Sh Abdullah, Gu-Feng Wu, Ahmad Fahim Zulkifli, Soo-Cheng Chuah et al.
Discover Public Health
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Multidimensional well being and socioeconomic inequality among middle aged and older adults in Jiangsu and Gansu China

Sharifah Shafinaz Sh Abdullah, Gu-Feng Wu, Ahmad Fahim Zulkifli, Soo-Cheng Chuah, Jiang Lu, Jia-Qi Zhao
article en

Abstract

This study uses data from the 2020 wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study to examine multidimensional well being among adults aged 45 years and above in Jiangsu and Gansu, two provinces with distinct development profiles. The index draws on twelve indicators covering education and cognition, lifestyle risk, health status, economic support, and social security. Equal weights are assigned across dimensions, while entropy weights are used for the indicators within each dimension. Missing values are imputed using Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations, and the estimates are pooled across the imputed datasets using Rubin’s rules. Socioeconomic inequality is assessed with the Slope Index of Inequality and the Relative Index of Inequality based on household consumption rankings. Although the two provinces record very similar overall composite scores, the pattern beneath those scores differs. Jiangsu shows a clearer advantage in health status, while Gansu displays a modest relative strength in economic support and social security coverage. The most pronounced socioeconomic gradient appears in education and cognition. The lifestyle dimension moves in the opposite direction, especially in Gansu, where lifestyle related risk is relatively higher among groups with higher household consumption. Under the baseline specification, women show slightly higher composite scores than men, though this difference becomes less stable once the dimensional specification is changed. What matters here is not simply that the provincial averages are close, but that the underlying composition of well being and its distribution across groups are not the same. Looking across dimensions makes these differences easier to see and helps identify where inequality is most concentrated.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY), Jinzhou Medical University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.