An analysis of alcohol compression ignition strategies on different engine platforms

• Experimental data from four different engines of different sizes was analyzed. • Pilot injections reduce near-TDC heat absorption penalty of alcohol fuel injection. • Intake heating results in a significant heat transfer and thermodynamic efficiency penalty. • Moderate compression ratio with pilot injection and ignition enhancer is optimal. Strategies that enable ignition of the low cetane alcohol fuels (methanol and ethanol) include intake heating (direct or via hot residual trapping), increased compression ratio (CR), multi-injection strategies, ignition enhancers, and active prechambers. The literature consistently shows alcohol compression ignition (CI) is more efficient than diesel at high loads irrespective of ignition strategy but shows contradictory results at low loads. To understand this, this work combines data from four different engine platforms ranging from a displaced volume of 0.4 to 2.1 L/cyl. using different alcohol CI ignition strategies. Using modeling to support experimental analysis, alcohol-specific efficiency penalties are highlighted to inform alcohol combustion system development. The alcohols’ lower energy density means more fuel must be injected near top dead center to achieve a given load, increasing the relative penalty of sensible/latent heating. Pilot injections help reduce this penalty. Intake heating incurs both a heat transfer penalty and a thermodynamic penalty due to a reduced ratio of specific heats during compression. A strategy that combines elevated CR, large pilot injections, and ignition enhancers can avoid this penalty. Alternatively, a prechamber strategy can achieve this without changing the CR, nor needing ignition enhancers in the fuel. At low loads, diesel burns in a partially premixed mode characterized by high burn rates and low heat losses, reducing alcohol-specific combustion benefits. Alcohol CI on the light-duty platform showed abnormally high heat transfer over diesel compared to other platforms, favoring a more premixed/partially premixed strategy despite a combustion efficiency tradeoff.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.139393
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An analysis of alcohol compression ignition strategies on different engine platforms

Jared Zeman, Sebastian Verhelst, Brian Gainey, Ankur Bhatt et al.
Fuel
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
article

An analysis of alcohol compression ignition strategies on different engine platforms

Jared Zeman, Sebastian Verhelst, Brian Gainey, Ankur Bhatt, Benjamin Lawler, Quinten Dejaegere, Musharrat Chowdhury, Kunal Vedpathak, Dario Lopez Pintor, Adam Dempsey, Martin Tunér, Tyler Johnston, Sanguk Lee
article en

Abstract

• Experimental data from four different engines of different sizes was analyzed. • Pilot injections reduce near-TDC heat absorption penalty of alcohol fuel injection. • Intake heating results in a significant heat transfer and thermodynamic efficiency penalty. • Moderate compression ratio with pilot injection and ignition enhancer is optimal. Strategies that enable ignition of the low cetane alcohol fuels (methanol and ethanol) include intake heating (direct or via hot residual trapping), increased compression ratio (CR), multi-injection strategies, ignition enhancers, and active prechambers. The literature consistently shows alcohol compression ignition (CI) is more efficient than diesel at high loads irrespective of ignition strategy but shows contradictory results at low loads. To understand this, this work combines data from four different engine platforms ranging from a displaced volume of 0.4 to 2.1 L/cyl. using different alcohol CI ignition strategies. Using modeling to support experimental analysis, alcohol-specific efficiency penalties are highlighted to inform alcohol combustion system development. The alcohols’ lower energy density means more fuel must be injected near top dead center to achieve a given load, increasing the relative penalty of sensible/latent heating. Pilot injections help reduce this penalty. Intake heating incurs both a heat transfer penalty and a thermodynamic penalty due to a reduced ratio of specific heats during compression. A strategy that combines elevated CR, large pilot injections, and ignition enhancers can avoid this penalty. Alternatively, a prechamber strategy can achieve this without changing the CR, nor needing ignition enhancers in the fuel. At low loads, diesel burns in a partially premixed mode characterized by high burn rates and low heat losses, reducing alcohol-specific combustion benefits. Alcohol CI on the light-duty platform showed abnormally high heat transfer over diesel compared to other platforms, favoring a more premixed/partially premixed strategy despite a combustion efficiency tradeoff.

FuelVol. 426
Marquette University (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Lund University (SE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Clemson University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.