Ship–Pier Collision Criteria for Critical Bridges: The Way Forward

The collapse of the Francis Scott Key (FSK) Bridge in Baltimore on March 26, 2024, presents an opportunity to evaluate US design guidance for addressing low-probability, high-consequence events involving essential bridge infrastructure. This paper reviews the development of vessel collision provisions, focusing on the progression of AASHTO guidelines from 1991 to the current 2009 edition, and compares them with international standards from Europe, China, Japan, Australia, and Canada. The underlying design philosophy for vessel collision is critically compared with established blast and seismic design approaches to assess adequacy and identify gaps. A representative case study is used to frame a critique of the current AASHTO provisions for critical bridges, and a framework is proposed to advance existing standards toward consequence-based, deterministic mandates for physical protection, leveraging modern data analysis and simulation tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-7997
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ship–Pier Collision Criteria for Critical Bridges: The Way Forward

Sherif El-Tawil, Hongfan Wang, Ran Cao
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Ship–Pier Collision Criteria for Critical Bridges: The Way Forward

Sherif El-Tawil, Hongfan Wang, Ran Cao
article en

Abstract

The collapse of the Francis Scott Key (FSK) Bridge in Baltimore on March 26, 2024, presents an opportunity to evaluate US design guidance for addressing low-probability, high-consequence events involving essential bridge infrastructure. This paper reviews the development of vessel collision provisions, focusing on the progression of AASHTO guidelines from 1991 to the current 2009 edition, and compares them with international standards from Europe, China, Japan, Australia, and Canada. The underlying design philosophy for vessel collision is critically compared with established blast and seismic design approaches to assess adequacy and identify gaps. A representative case study is used to frame a critique of the current AASHTO provisions for critical bridges, and a framework is proposed to advance existing standards toward consequence-based, deterministic mandates for physical protection, leveraging modern data analysis and simulation tools.

Journal of Bridge EngineeringVol. 31(7)
City College of New York (US), Hunan University (CN), City University of New York (US), University of Michigan (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.