Systemic barriers to academic success among historically disadvantaged students: a qualitative case study at a South African university

Background South African universities have expanded access for historically disadvantaged students (HDS), yet persistent inequalities continue to shape academic success. Empirical evidence remains limited on how institutional, socio-economic, and pedagogical factors intersect to influence epistemic access within historically disadvantaged institutions. Methods This study employed a qualitative case study design at a public South African university. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 participants, including undergraduate students ( n = 14), academic staff ( n = 4), and support staff ( n = 7) between 01 June 2022 and 30 October 2025. Participants were purposively sampled. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results The analysis identified four interrelated themes: (1) academic under-preparedness linked to unequal schooling backgrounds; (2) persistent financial precarity extending beyond formal financial aid; (3) digital exclusion exacerbated by blended learning modalities; and (4) uneven institutional capacity to support curriculum transformation and student support services. These factors collectively constrained students’ epistemic access and academic progression. Conclusions The findings demonstrate that widening access alone is insufficient to ensure student success. Structural inequalities embedded within academic, financial, and digital systems continue to shape educational outcomes. Addressing these constraints requires institutionally coordinated interventions that extend beyond financial aid to include academic development, digital inclusion, and staff capacity building. The study contributes qualitative evidence to debates on higher education inequality in the Global South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1781949
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic barriers to academic success among historically disadvantaged students: a qualitative case study at a South African university

Siyabulela Christopher Fobosi, Mzuzomhe Caluza, Pearl Zukiswa Mkuzo, Anele Sidzumo
Frontiers in Education
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

Systemic barriers to academic success among historically disadvantaged students: a qualitative case study at a South African university

Siyabulela Christopher Fobosi, Mzuzomhe Caluza, Pearl Zukiswa Mkuzo, Anele Sidzumo
article en

Abstract

Background South African universities have expanded access for historically disadvantaged students (HDS), yet persistent inequalities continue to shape academic success. Empirical evidence remains limited on how institutional, socio-economic, and pedagogical factors intersect to influence epistemic access within historically disadvantaged institutions. Methods This study employed a qualitative case study design at a public South African university. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 participants, including undergraduate students ( n = 14), academic staff ( n = 4), and support staff ( n = 7) between 01 June 2022 and 30 October 2025. Participants were purposively sampled. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results The analysis identified four interrelated themes: (1) academic under-preparedness linked to unequal schooling backgrounds; (2) persistent financial precarity extending beyond formal financial aid; (3) digital exclusion exacerbated by blended learning modalities; and (4) uneven institutional capacity to support curriculum transformation and student support services. These factors collectively constrained students’ epistemic access and academic progression. Conclusions The findings demonstrate that widening access alone is insufficient to ensure student success. Structural inequalities embedded within academic, financial, and digital systems continue to shape educational outcomes. Addressing these constraints requires institutionally coordinated interventions that extend beyond financial aid to include academic development, digital inclusion, and staff capacity building. The study contributes qualitative evidence to debates on higher education inequality in the Global South.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
University of Fort Hare (ZA), CME Group (United States) (US)
National Research Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.