Environmental stewardship and robotic surgery: innovation without compromise

Robotic surgery represents a major paradigm shift in surgical care, delivering significant improvements in precision, ergonomics, and postoperative patient outcomes. However, the rapid global proliferation of these systems necessitates a critical evaluation of their environmental sustainability. The healthcare sector, particularly within hospital operating theatres, is already a highly resource-intensive environment contributing substantially to national greenhouse gas emissions. The integration of robotic platforms may further exacerbate this ecological footprint through energy-intensive console and robotic arm operations, high consumption of single-use instruments, complex waste streams, and significant upstream manufacturing emissions. Recent life-cycle assessments indicate that robotic systems draw approximately 3.5 kW during operation, generating roughly 4 kg of CO₂ per hour. This is markedly higher than the 0.6 kW and 1 kg of CO₂ per hour associated with conventional laparoscopic equipment. This commentary piece aims to highlight these environmental realities for surgeons and key stakeholders. We do not advocate for the abandonment of robotic surgery, as its clinical benefits remain high. Rather, we issue a call for responsible environmental stewardship and innovation toward ecologically sustainable robotic platforms and components that maintain clinical excellence while mitigating planetary harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03419-0
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental stewardship and robotic surgery: innovation without compromise

Noor Naqeeb, J Kovoor, Kingsley Faulkner, Mathew O. Jacob et al.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Environmental stewardship and robotic surgery: innovation without compromise

Noor Naqeeb, J Kovoor, Kingsley Faulkner, Mathew O. Jacob, Gavin J. Carmichael
article en

Abstract

Robotic surgery represents a major paradigm shift in surgical care, delivering significant improvements in precision, ergonomics, and postoperative patient outcomes. However, the rapid global proliferation of these systems necessitates a critical evaluation of their environmental sustainability. The healthcare sector, particularly within hospital operating theatres, is already a highly resource-intensive environment contributing substantially to national greenhouse gas emissions. The integration of robotic platforms may further exacerbate this ecological footprint through energy-intensive console and robotic arm operations, high consumption of single-use instruments, complex waste streams, and significant upstream manufacturing emissions. Recent life-cycle assessments indicate that robotic systems draw approximately 3.5 kW during operation, generating roughly 4 kg of CO₂ per hour. This is markedly higher than the 0.6 kW and 1 kg of CO₂ per hour associated with conventional laparoscopic equipment. This commentary piece aims to highlight these environmental realities for surgeons and key stakeholders. We do not advocate for the abandonment of robotic surgery, as its clinical benefits remain high. Rather, we issue a call for responsible environmental stewardship and innovation toward ecologically sustainable robotic platforms and components that maintain clinical excellence while mitigating planetary harm.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
Ballarat Health Services (AU), Doctors of the World (US), Grampians Health, The University of Adelaide (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.