Network analysis of factors affecting the quality of life of nurses

Introduction Nurses experience high levels of work-related stress, which can affect their wellbeing and the quality of care they provide. Existing studies often examine stress factors in isolation, overlooking how they interconnect. This study investigates the relationships between nurses' professional quality of life, role stress, work-related rumination, and moral sensitivity, aiming to identify central factors within this network. Methods We surveyed 1,879 clinical nurses using validated scales measuring occupational quality of life, role stress, work rumination, and moral sensitivity. Network analysis was applied to model the interactions among these variables. Results The resulting network illustrates how different dimensions of nurses' occupational well-being are interrelated. Central variables included secondary trauma, emotional rumination, and empathic satisfaction. Key connectors linking different psychological domains were problem-solving rumination, job burnout, and moral distress. The network structure demonstrated good stability. Discussion Nurses' occupational mental health functions as a dynamic system, in which certain factors act as central drivers or bridges between areas of stress. These findings help inform the development of staged and tailored intervention strategies in healthcare settings. They also support a shift toward systemic approaches in nursing psychology research. Future studies could employ longitudinal designs to track changes over time and incorporate multi-source data to further clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2026.1734686
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network analysis of factors affecting the quality of life of nurses

Yanjie Yang, Tianyi Bu, Z.H. Liu, Yuecui Kan et al.
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Network analysis of factors affecting the quality of life of nurses

Yanjie Yang, Tianyi Bu, Z.H. Liu, Yuecui Kan, Zhengxue Qiao, Bowen Wan, Jiawei Zhou
article en

Abstract

Introduction Nurses experience high levels of work-related stress, which can affect their wellbeing and the quality of care they provide. Existing studies often examine stress factors in isolation, overlooking how they interconnect. This study investigates the relationships between nurses' professional quality of life, role stress, work-related rumination, and moral sensitivity, aiming to identify central factors within this network. Methods We surveyed 1,879 clinical nurses using validated scales measuring occupational quality of life, role stress, work rumination, and moral sensitivity. Network analysis was applied to model the interactions among these variables. Results The resulting network illustrates how different dimensions of nurses' occupational well-being are interrelated. Central variables included secondary trauma, emotional rumination, and empathic satisfaction. Key connectors linking different psychological domains were problem-solving rumination, job burnout, and moral distress. The network structure demonstrated good stability. Discussion Nurses' occupational mental health functions as a dynamic system, in which certain factors act as central drivers or bridges between areas of stress. These findings help inform the development of staged and tailored intervention strategies in healthcare settings. They also support a shift toward systemic approaches in nursing psychology research. Future studies could employ longitudinal designs to track changes over time and incorporate multi-source data to further clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Frontiers in Organizational PsychologyVol. 4
Harbin Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.