Publishing on Highly Complex Orthotic Interventions in Highly Complex Conditions

The needs of children are usually considered as paramount. In this context, a request is being made for all journals to review their capacity to include articles on highly complex orthotic interventions for highly complex conditions, including cerebral palsy (CP). A recent Scoping Review evaluated whether authors and editors complied with the 2010 Best Practice Guidelines for Reporting ankle-foot orthosis interventions for children with CP.1,2 Despite the guidelines and previous international consensus conferences advocating for comprehensive documentation of orthotic interventions, the scoping review found reporting to be inconsistent and inadequate, and there were persistent gaps.1 Just 9 of 64 publications complied with reporting essential alignments, and only 11 referred to the guidelines. The 64 publications were spread across 35 journals (Appendix 1). Some well-established journals performed very poorly. One such journal had none of 11 publications compliant, another had two of eight compliant, another one of five compliant, and another none of three compliant. Some 26 journals published one article on the topic, and just two of those articles complied. A statement made in Ridgewell et al, that “there was considerable variety in the level and quality of detail reported. This limits any assessment of intervention quality and the impact this may have on confidence in the findings” unfortunately still holds true in 2026.1,2 In the light of these findings, journals should review their capacity to include studies on highly complex orthotic interventions for highly complex conditions, such as CP. By enhancing the quality of reporting, the field can progress towards more effective and coherent evidence-based interventions for children with CP. It would be beneficial to children for journals to now cooperate together and decide which journals are best placed to be able to accept and review submissions on such topics. In the meantime, if a journal chooses to include ankle-foot orthosis interventions for children with CP in their remit, they should ensure that the original guidelines2 and the upgraded guidelines1 are adhered to. This editorial is published as Open Access to allow other journals to republish the statement as they review their scope and instructions to authors, and possibly collaborate with other journals to decide which are best positioned to receive submissions on highly complex orthotic interventions for highly complex conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jpo.0000000000000633
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Publishing on Highly Complex Orthotic Interventions in Highly Complex Conditions

Elaine Owen
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

Publishing on Highly Complex Orthotic Interventions in Highly Complex Conditions

Elaine Owen
article en

Abstract

The needs of children are usually considered as paramount. In this context, a request is being made for all journals to review their capacity to include articles on highly complex orthotic interventions for highly complex conditions, including cerebral palsy (CP). A recent Scoping Review evaluated whether authors and editors complied with the 2010 Best Practice Guidelines for Reporting ankle-foot orthosis interventions for children with CP.1,2 Despite the guidelines and previous international consensus conferences advocating for comprehensive documentation of orthotic interventions, the scoping review found reporting to be inconsistent and inadequate, and there were persistent gaps.1 Just 9 of 64 publications complied with reporting essential alignments, and only 11 referred to the guidelines. The 64 publications were spread across 35 journals (Appendix 1). Some well-established journals performed very poorly. One such journal had none of 11 publications compliant, another had two of eight compliant, another one of five compliant, and another none of three compliant. Some 26 journals published one article on the topic, and just two of those articles complied. A statement made in Ridgewell et al, that “there was considerable variety in the level and quality of detail reported. This limits any assessment of intervention quality and the impact this may have on confidence in the findings” unfortunately still holds true in 2026.1,2 In the light of these findings, journals should review their capacity to include studies on highly complex orthotic interventions for highly complex conditions, such as CP. By enhancing the quality of reporting, the field can progress towards more effective and coherent evidence-based interventions for children with CP. It would be beneficial to children for journals to now cooperate together and decide which journals are best placed to be able to accept and review submissions on such topics. In the meantime, if a journal chooses to include ankle-foot orthosis interventions for children with CP in their remit, they should ensure that the original guidelines2 and the upgraded guidelines1 are adhered to. This editorial is published as Open Access to allow other journals to republish the statement as they review their scope and instructions to authors, and possibly collaborate with other journals to decide which are best positioned to receive submissions on highly complex orthotic interventions for highly complex conditions.

JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Child Development Center (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.