Protocol for measuring the effects of cortical scotoma on visual space perception

We aim to investigate the spatial experience of patients with chronic scotomas caused by lesion to early visual cortex, including primary visual cortex (V1) and adjacent extrastriate visual areas. These experiments are conducted as part of an adversarial collaboration testing contrasting theories of consciousness: Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and two Predictive Processing accounts, Active Inference (AI) and Neurorepresentationalism (NREP). The central question is whether lesions to early visual cortex alter the experienced extent of visual space itself, or instead primarily disrupt stimulus content within an otherwise preserved visual space. To address this, we use paradigms in which patients estimate distances or spatial extents that either span a scotomatous region or fall entirely within intact visual field locations. Psychometric functions relating perceived and physical extent are modeled to estimate shifts in the point of subjective equality (PSE). According to IIT, lesions to early visual cortex, including V1 and occipital extrastriate cortex, should lead to systematic reductions in perceived spatial extent across the scotoma (negative PSE shifts), reflecting a contraction of experienced space. In contrast, Predictive Processing accounts posit that higher-level predictive mechanisms preserve spatial structure despite loss of early input, predicting little or no systematic contraction (with NREP allowing limited context-dependent effects). By quantifying distortions in perceived spatial extent, this protocol aims to distinguish between these competing theoretical predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352036
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Protocol for measuring the effects of cortical scotoma on visual space perception

Giulio Tononi, Eli Peli, Elena Monai, Cyriel M. A. Pennartz et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
2.25
article

Protocol for measuring the effects of cortical scotoma on visual space perception

Giulio Tononi, Eli Peli, Elena Monai, Cyriel M. A. Pennartz, Andrew Haun, Wei Hau Lew, Karl John Friston, Mélanie Boly, Daejoon Hwang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We aim to investigate the spatial experience of patients with chronic scotomas caused by lesion to early visual cortex, including primary visual cortex (V1) and adjacent extrastriate visual areas. These experiments are conducted as part of an adversarial collaboration testing contrasting theories of consciousness: Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and two Predictive Processing accounts, Active Inference (AI) and Neurorepresentationalism (NREP). The central question is whether lesions to early visual cortex alter the experienced extent of visual space itself, or instead primarily disrupt stimulus content within an otherwise preserved visual space. To address this, we use paradigms in which patients estimate distances or spatial extents that either span a scotomatous region or fall entirely within intact visual field locations. Psychometric functions relating perceived and physical extent are modeled to estimate shifts in the point of subjective equality (PSE). According to IIT, lesions to early visual cortex, including V1 and occipital extrastriate cortex, should lead to systematic reductions in perceived spatial extent across the scotoma (negative PSE shifts), reflecting a contraction of experienced space. In contrast, Predictive Processing accounts posit that higher-level predictive mechanisms preserve spatial structure despite loss of early input, predicting little or no systematic contraction (with NREP allowing limited context-dependent effects). By quantifying distortions in perceived spatial extent, this protocol aims to distinguish between these competing theoretical predictions.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(11)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB), University College London (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon