Impact of eccentric exercise on walking functional capacity after severe COVID-19: randomized, controlled open-label trial

INTRODUCTION: Severe COVID-19 infection leads to profound pulmonary, cardiovascular, and neuromuscular impairments, resulting in marked exercise deconditioning and reduced functional walking capacity after hospital discharge. Eccentric cycling offers high mechanical load with low metabolic cost and may therefore represent a relevant rehabilitation strategy to restore functional capacity in people after COVID-19. AIM: To compare functional recovery after 8 weeks of eccentric (ECC) or concentric (CON) training in individuals discharged 1 month previously after a COVID-19 infection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CovExc trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study conducted in 3 centers. Adults (<80 years) at least 1 month after hospital discharge for severe COVID-19 were randomized (1:1) to 8 weeks of ECC or concentric CON ergometer training (3 30-min sessions per week). The primary outcome was change in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance between baseline and post-intervention (M2). Secondary outcomes included physical performance, muscle strength (handgrip), fatigue, and quality of life. Analyses were conducted in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population using mixed models. RESULTS: Of the 60 participants enrolled, 56 (median age (IQR): 54.5 (48; 62)) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, including 33 men (59%). Forty-four participants completed the program. Intergroup analysis showed no significant differences between the ECC and CON for any variable. However, within-group analyses of the primary endpoint (mITT and per-protocol) revealed a significant change between baseline and 2 months (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001 for ECC and CON groups on mITT and P = 0.001 for ECC and CON groups on per-protocol). 6MWT improved by 18 m in ECC (0; 72) and 28 m in CON (0; 53) (median difference -10 m; 95% CI (-42 to 22). CONCLUSION: Both eccentric and concentric training improved walking distance in participants after COVID-19, with no difference between groups. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of these approaches for people who survived COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04649086.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2026.102125
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of eccentric exercise on walking functional capacity after severe COVID-19: randomized, controlled open-label trial

Léonard Féasson, Paul Ornetti, Bruno Pereira, Emmanuel Coudeyre et al.
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Impact of eccentric exercise on walking functional capacity after severe COVID-19: randomized, controlled open-label trial

Léonard Féasson, Paul Ornetti, Bruno Pereira, Emmanuel Coudeyre, Ruddy Richard, Anaïs Gouteron, Charlotte Lanhers, Maxime Grolier, F. Rannou, Mathilde Pelletier Visa, Frédéric Costes, Cédric Cormier
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Severe COVID-19 infection leads to profound pulmonary, cardiovascular, and neuromuscular impairments, resulting in marked exercise deconditioning and reduced functional walking capacity after hospital discharge. Eccentric cycling offers high mechanical load with low metabolic cost and may therefore represent a relevant rehabilitation strategy to restore functional capacity in people after COVID-19. AIM: To compare functional recovery after 8 weeks of eccentric (ECC) or concentric (CON) training in individuals discharged 1 month previously after a COVID-19 infection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CovExc trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study conducted in 3 centers. Adults (<80 years) at least 1 month after hospital discharge for severe COVID-19 were randomized (1:1) to 8 weeks of ECC or concentric CON ergometer training (3 30-min sessions per week). The primary outcome was change in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance between baseline and post-intervention (M2). Secondary outcomes included physical performance, muscle strength (handgrip), fatigue, and quality of life. Analyses were conducted in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population using mixed models. RESULTS: Of the 60 participants enrolled, 56 (median age (IQR): 54.5 (48; 62)) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, including 33 men (59%). Forty-four participants completed the program. Intergroup analysis showed no significant differences between the ECC and CON for any variable. However, within-group analyses of the primary endpoint (mITT and per-protocol) revealed a significant change between baseline and 2 months (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001 for ECC and CON groups on mITT and P = 0.001 for ECC and CON groups on per-protocol). 6MWT improved by 18 m in ECC (0; 72) and 28 m in CON (0; 53) (median difference -10 m; 95% CI (-42 to 22). CONCLUSION: Both eccentric and concentric training improved walking distance in participants after COVID-19, with no difference between groups. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of these approaches for people who survived COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04649086.

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineVol. 69(5)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), University of Clermont Auvergne (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR), Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités de Dijon (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR)
Direction Générale de l’offre de Soins, Direction de l’hospitalisation et de l’offre de Soins
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.